24.12.2012 Views

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

165<br />

is his anger extended to humankind which refuses to acknowledge the warning<br />

contained in the deluge myth? His rage is communicated as a “fractious challenge” (line<br />

23), which would indicate that he is railing against both nature and humankind.<br />

The plural f<strong>or</strong>m of “scourings” in the title of the poem indicates that it contains<br />

levels of meaning. The flood literally scours the land clean of man-made material, plants<br />

and animals. The results of this cleansing action of the water are the “scourings” <strong>or</strong> debris<br />

which have been washed into the sea and then deposited by the ocean on the beaches.<br />

The poem deals with the results of these cleansing <strong>or</strong> purging actions of the water.<br />

The first two stanzas describe the aftermath of the flood and the remaining three<br />

give voice to the unlikely crow of the indignant bantam. The colourful and handsome<br />

cock with his range of <strong>or</strong>ange, brown, scarlet and black feathers mirr<strong>or</strong>s Chaucer’s<br />

Chauntecleer whose “coomb was redder than fyn c<strong>or</strong>al” (line 2859, in Robinson 199), his<br />

bill jet black and the colour of his feathers “lyk the burned gold” (line 2864). The bantam<br />

is aptly compared to “chanticleer” because Chaucer’s Chauntecleer is the cock which<br />

crows the loudest, “In al the land, of crowyng nas his peer” (4040) and who is said, by his<br />

wife Pertelote, to have too strong an imagination which comes from “the greete<br />

superfluytee / <strong>or</strong> youre rede colera” (2927-8). By alluding to this literary bird,<br />

Livingstone emphasises the bantam’s delusions of grandeur. How can one bird, no matter<br />

how loudly it crows, reverse the effects of this natural cataclysm?<br />

In stanza four he "bellows" his "fierce" outrage as an “epithet” (lines 16 and 17), a<br />

swear w<strong>or</strong>d, directed at the sun. This is not the rising sun, traditionally hailed by all<br />

cocks, but a sun which has been cowed by the flood and which now seems wary and is<br />

hiding (“crouched”) behind <strong>or</strong> on the h<strong>or</strong>izon. The sun “hesitates / on the threshold”<br />

(lines 18-19) as it surveys the flood damage <strong>or</strong> “all that vehemence” (line 19). The<br />

bantam rails against this “vehemence” of nature and the “inex<strong>or</strong>ability” of the ravaging<br />

effects of the flood by chastising the sun f<strong>or</strong> its cowardice. He wants the sun to come out<br />

and the n<strong>or</strong>mal cycle of nature to return. This is why he is reduced to “polysyllabic<br />

epithets” and not his usual daily greeting of the sun. He swears at the disruption and<br />

cannot give the “All Clear” (line 20). The sun serves as metaph<strong>or</strong> f<strong>or</strong> the energy of the<br />

life f<strong>or</strong>ce and f<strong>or</strong> humankind’s need f<strong>or</strong> rational <strong>or</strong>der. Livingstone regarded the sun and<br />

philosophy as masculine (Fazzini 1990: 140).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!