"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
184<br />
A brief comparison between “A Visit<strong>or</strong> at Station 21” and an earlier poem in<br />
the collection, “The Chargers at Station 7” (23), shows a shift in Livingstone’s<br />
treatment of the irreconcilable tension between reason and passion. In “Chargers” Apollo<br />
(reason) and Dionysus (passion) are “bound f<strong>or</strong> sundering, / bound f<strong>or</strong> exploding” (lines<br />
13-14) whereas in “A Visit<strong>or</strong>” a fleeting glimpse of “unsundered creation” (M<strong>or</strong>phet 206)<br />
is attained. This is attained through imaginative identification and Livingstone’s uncanny<br />
(inexplicable) ability to physically touch and psychically commune with a wild animal.<br />
An <strong>or</strong>ganic state beyond “mentation” (line 35) is apprehended during the poet’s physical<br />
and psychic encounter with the duiker. This momentarily frees him from his tangled<br />
philosophical agonising over the apparently irreconcilable contraries of the will and the<br />
imagination. Is this poem, then, intimating that humankind should best f<strong>or</strong>ego thinking<br />
and return to a m<strong>or</strong>e physical state of being in the w<strong>or</strong>ld? This is not possible and, even if<br />
it were, it would not be sustainable.<br />
The power of art<br />
Art, as an imaginative process, is one of the saving graces which may help heal the<br />
“sundered” psyche of humankind. If Livingstone’s aim is to make us know our place, <strong>or</strong><br />
see our true position within the natural framew<strong>or</strong>k of the Earth, how can the artificial<br />
construct of art serve this aim? An analysis of the treatment of art in four of the poems in<br />
A Litt<strong>or</strong>al Zone will hopefully go some way towards answering this conundrum.<br />
“Haunted Estuary” (11) lauds Hildegard of Bingen (1098-1179), the medieval<br />
nun and visionary, who produced divinely inspired writings and illuminations. Her<br />
prophecies and w<strong>or</strong>k live on through her art. In the final lines of the poem Livingstone<br />
beseeches her (<strong>or</strong>, m<strong>or</strong>e accurately, her art) to “cosset” what remains of humanity’s<br />
atunement with the cycles of nature: “this residuum of the moon’s”. Scholars suggest that<br />
Hildegard of Bingen was deeply ecological, hundreds of years bef<strong>or</strong>e the concept was<br />
f<strong>or</strong>malised. She used the term viriditas, translated as ‘moisture in greenness’, in her<br />
writings. The following extract is from her Scivias II (5, 46):<br />
I have the green land under my control. Did I give that to you, man, so that you<br />
could make whatever crop you wanted germinate? And if you sow seed upon it<br />
surely you cannot induce it to fruit? No. F<strong>or</strong> you can neither provide dew, n<strong>or</strong><br />
produce rain, n<strong>or</strong> bestow moisture in greenness, n<strong>or</strong> draw heat with the glow of<br />
the sun – of which are required f<strong>or</strong> producing a crop. (quoted in Bowie 76)