"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
49<br />
conflict: “I don’t think anything … is incompatible with poetry. I think they are all<br />
interconnected with all aspects of literature and aspects of science. They are aspects of<br />
man on this earth” (1985: 112). His ecological sensibility is obvious in not only this<br />
quotation but in much of the published biographical and autobiographical material on<br />
Douglas Livingstone. He dubbed himself as “The Black Knight” (The Anvil’s Undertone<br />
26; hereafter referred to as AU) who is “apocalyptic f<strong>or</strong> the Earth”, but he might better be<br />
called a green knight who fights, in vain, to communicate his ecological sensibility. This<br />
awareness is based on material scientific fact and he communicates this through his<br />
poetry. He (grudgingly) admits this in the Chapman interview: “Maybe I am trying,<br />
rather egotistically, to bridge a gap, unobtrusively to bring in science in my w<strong>or</strong>k, to<br />
make science m<strong>or</strong>e ‘accessible’” (1985:114).<br />
Another of Livingstone’s preoccupations was the pursuit of truth. He said his aim<br />
in writing poetry was to entertain, but, without losing sight of the ‘truth’: “I would rather<br />
say a poet tends to interpret the truth … But Plato is also c<strong>or</strong>rect: a poet … certainly uses<br />
fictions to convey the truth. Poets should, I maintain, try to remain entertaining” (Fazzini<br />
1990: 141). He was aware of the elusiveness of truth: “Both science and poetry<br />
constitute hard w<strong>or</strong>k towards the truth. The truth is very difficult to get at, but everybody<br />
carries it with him” (Livingstone 1990: 59). The published paper “Science and Truth” 13 ,<br />
demonstrates D.J. Livingstone’s search f<strong>or</strong> an ontological and physical explanation of life<br />
on Earth. The paper is a careful analysis of views on truth by various intellectuals. He<br />
questions the existence of “objective” truth and says: “There appears to be a growing<br />
school of thinking which maintains that (my oversimplification follows here):<br />
imaginatively expanded cognitive modes can transcend the purely subjective” (1986:<br />
101). He says that the contemp<strong>or</strong>ary ontologist M. Whiteman, along with “such daring<br />
<strong>or</strong>iginals” as J.E. Lovelock, Lewis Thomas and Nicholas Humphrey, “aff<strong>or</strong>d us<br />
glimmerings of the whole as one… The c<strong>or</strong>pus appears to be not so much the life on, but<br />
the life of the Earth; and the singularities of such a vision must consequently ‘provide the<br />
13 The Livingstone papers housed at NELM (National English Literary Museum) indicate that “Science and<br />
Truth” was not written lightly <strong>or</strong> easily. Its <strong>or</strong>iginal draft is titled “Mundane Introspections on Science and<br />
Truth” (dated February 1986). The papers include annotated and edited drafts and are interleaved with<br />
articles by the thinkers he quotes in the article. There are also notes on ontology.