24.12.2012 Views

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

49<br />

conflict: “I don’t think anything … is incompatible with poetry. I think they are all<br />

interconnected with all aspects of literature and aspects of science. They are aspects of<br />

man on this earth” (1985: 112). His ecological sensibility is obvious in not only this<br />

quotation but in much of the published biographical and autobiographical material on<br />

Douglas Livingstone. He dubbed himself as “The Black Knight” (The Anvil’s Undertone<br />

26; hereafter referred to as AU) who is “apocalyptic f<strong>or</strong> the Earth”, but he might better be<br />

called a green knight who fights, in vain, to communicate his ecological sensibility. This<br />

awareness is based on material scientific fact and he communicates this through his<br />

poetry. He (grudgingly) admits this in the Chapman interview: “Maybe I am trying,<br />

rather egotistically, to bridge a gap, unobtrusively to bring in science in my w<strong>or</strong>k, to<br />

make science m<strong>or</strong>e ‘accessible’” (1985:114).<br />

Another of Livingstone’s preoccupations was the pursuit of truth. He said his aim<br />

in writing poetry was to entertain, but, without losing sight of the ‘truth’: “I would rather<br />

say a poet tends to interpret the truth … But Plato is also c<strong>or</strong>rect: a poet … certainly uses<br />

fictions to convey the truth. Poets should, I maintain, try to remain entertaining” (Fazzini<br />

1990: 141). He was aware of the elusiveness of truth: “Both science and poetry<br />

constitute hard w<strong>or</strong>k towards the truth. The truth is very difficult to get at, but everybody<br />

carries it with him” (Livingstone 1990: 59). The published paper “Science and Truth” 13 ,<br />

demonstrates D.J. Livingstone’s search f<strong>or</strong> an ontological and physical explanation of life<br />

on Earth. The paper is a careful analysis of views on truth by various intellectuals. He<br />

questions the existence of “objective” truth and says: “There appears to be a growing<br />

school of thinking which maintains that (my oversimplification follows here):<br />

imaginatively expanded cognitive modes can transcend the purely subjective” (1986:<br />

101). He says that the contemp<strong>or</strong>ary ontologist M. Whiteman, along with “such daring<br />

<strong>or</strong>iginals” as J.E. Lovelock, Lewis Thomas and Nicholas Humphrey, “aff<strong>or</strong>d us<br />

glimmerings of the whole as one… The c<strong>or</strong>pus appears to be not so much the life on, but<br />

the life of the Earth; and the singularities of such a vision must consequently ‘provide the<br />

13 The Livingstone papers housed at NELM (National English Literary Museum) indicate that “Science and<br />

Truth” was not written lightly <strong>or</strong> easily. Its <strong>or</strong>iginal draft is titled “Mundane Introspections on Science and<br />

Truth” (dated February 1986). The papers include annotated and edited drafts and are interleaved with<br />

articles by the thinkers he quotes in the article. There are also notes on ontology.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!