24.12.2012 Views

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

135<br />

anything Livingstone has written” (2002: 104), but does not explain why he says this.<br />

Dirk Klopper, in arguing that Livingstone depicts Africa as a place of predat<strong>or</strong>y violence,<br />

says this poem offers “the hope of love” through the imagery of the knight’s armour and<br />

that this counters “the fact that life is predat<strong>or</strong>y” (1997: 44).<br />

The poem reflects Livingstone’s belief in Darwinism, his need f<strong>or</strong> purpose in the<br />

face of contingency, and the role of the imagination in attaining this purpose. His<br />

technical acuity is evident here as throughout the collection. The Petrarchan f<strong>or</strong>m<br />

signifies <strong>or</strong>der and pattern, but a variation of the traditional rhyme scheme reflects the<br />

contingency <strong>or</strong> chance which governs the process of natural selection. The octave<br />

expl<strong>or</strong>es the problem of fear and the sestet offers a resolution through determinedness.<br />

The sonnet as lyric traditionally uses the first person pronoun, but Livingstone replaces<br />

this with the distancing device of the second person pronoun your (line 9) and you (line<br />

12).<br />

The opening line’s regular iambic pentameter provides a scaffold f<strong>or</strong> the list of<br />

apparently disparate objects. What is the connection between the crab, clot, muzzle and<br />

knife? They are all linked by the definite article “the”, but “<strong>or</strong>” separates the knife (a<br />

manmade object which I read as a trope f<strong>or</strong> the faculty of reason which resides in the<br />

human neoc<strong>or</strong>tex) from the previous three natural objects. Given the title’s reference to<br />

Darwinism, these four objects represent the adaptive process (<strong>or</strong> variation) which<br />

constitutes natural selection. 29 The clot in this aspect is read as a coagulated mass of<br />

material and the muzzle as that of an animal. F<strong>or</strong> the poet, they belong to a set of<br />

“nocturnal terr<strong>or</strong>isms” (line 2), an <strong>or</strong>ganised system of intimidation which is part of a<br />

recurring nightmare. If the four objects are read as a trope f<strong>or</strong> the evolutionary process,<br />

then it is the contingency of existence which terrifies the poet. Metaph<strong>or</strong>ically, each of<br />

the four objects also represents danger, <strong>or</strong> death, through the pincers of the crab,<br />

thrombosis induced by a blood clot, the muzzle of a gun, and the cutting sharpness of the<br />

knife. Both the evolutionary implications and the mechanical dangers contained in the<br />

four objects “patiently … stalk” (lines 1 and 2) the consciousness of the speaker.<br />

29 Stephen Jay Gould defines this as “(1) agency, <strong>or</strong> <strong>or</strong>ganismal struggle as the appropriate (and nearly<br />

exclusive) level of operation f<strong>or</strong> natural selection [and] (2) efficacy, <strong>or</strong> natural selection as the creative<br />

f<strong>or</strong>ce of evolutionary change (with complexly co-<strong>or</strong>dinated sequelae of inferred principles about the nature<br />

of variation…)” (2002: 59, my underlining).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!