"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
the stones, slaked battles, seas;<br />
the oil and olives from lost argosies.<br />
Chapman inc<strong>or</strong>rectly claims these lines display a Keatsian desire to “drink and leave the<br />
w<strong>or</strong>ld unseen” (92). I argue the opposite; the speaker is abs<strong>or</strong>bed into the w<strong>or</strong>ld, imagines<br />
himself as part of the mysterious sweep of life on Earth, both biological and cultural.<br />
Chapman’s well-considered analysis of “Gentling a Wildcat” shows that he is<br />
aware of Livingstone’s ecological sensibility. F<strong>or</strong> example:<br />
In ‘Gentling a Wildcat’, then, Livingstone, through the motif of the wildcat,<br />
dramatically renders his humanist concern f<strong>or</strong> creation and destruction in the<br />
pattern of life. Taking full cognizance of the scientific attitude, he admits to his<br />
identification with nature’s cruelty; yet he recognizes too that he is implicated not<br />
simply in a fundamental law of survival, but in the rich inclusiveness of life. By<br />
investing the brute facts of death with emotional significance, he suggests that it is<br />
imp<strong>or</strong>tant f<strong>or</strong> modern ‘scientific’ man to retain his capacity f<strong>or</strong> wonder, and above<br />
all f<strong>or</strong> sympathy. This poem is ultimately a tribute to the imaginative view of<br />
experience. (86-7, my italics)<br />
In her analysis of “Gentling a Wildcat” Narismulu points to the resolving of dislocation:<br />
“the persona reacts instinctively, and humanely (as well as irrationally) in an integrative<br />
spirit of co-operation, offering comf<strong>or</strong>t, sympathy, and synthesis in response to a<br />
situation of conflict, isolation, suffering and destruction” (154). Narisumulu’s comment<br />
contains too many anthropom<strong>or</strong>phic abstract nouns; it would have been enough to say<br />
‘offering synthesis in response to a situation of suffering and destruction’. (See p 89 f<strong>or</strong><br />
an ecocritical analysis of this poem which expl<strong>or</strong>es the speaker’s anthropom<strong>or</strong>phism.)<br />
The other poems with an animal motif in this collection include “A Bamboo<br />
Day”, “One Elephant”, and ‘Conversation with a Giraffe at Dusk in the Zoo”. Chapman<br />
claims these “do not present such an unremittingly harsh a view of existence” as do the<br />
animal poems in Sjambok (88). This is true of “One Elephant” (an ironic parody of<br />
human nature) and “Conversation with a Giraffe”. But I would argue that “A Bamboo<br />
Day”, through the image of drought and the predat<strong>or</strong>-prey relationship, strikingly depicts<br />
nature as uncaring and so does hark back to the “harsh view of existence” depicted in<br />
Sjambok. This ambivalent view of nature is maintained by Livingstone in all his w<strong>or</strong>k.<br />
In chapter four of his critical study Chapman claims the love poems in A Rosary<br />
of Bone are modelled on 17 th Century English Metaphysical poetry (116), but astutely<br />
adds:<br />
67