24.12.2012 Views

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the stones, slaked battles, seas;<br />

the oil and olives from lost argosies.<br />

Chapman inc<strong>or</strong>rectly claims these lines display a Keatsian desire to “drink and leave the<br />

w<strong>or</strong>ld unseen” (92). I argue the opposite; the speaker is abs<strong>or</strong>bed into the w<strong>or</strong>ld, imagines<br />

himself as part of the mysterious sweep of life on Earth, both biological and cultural.<br />

Chapman’s well-considered analysis of “Gentling a Wildcat” shows that he is<br />

aware of Livingstone’s ecological sensibility. F<strong>or</strong> example:<br />

In ‘Gentling a Wildcat’, then, Livingstone, through the motif of the wildcat,<br />

dramatically renders his humanist concern f<strong>or</strong> creation and destruction in the<br />

pattern of life. Taking full cognizance of the scientific attitude, he admits to his<br />

identification with nature’s cruelty; yet he recognizes too that he is implicated not<br />

simply in a fundamental law of survival, but in the rich inclusiveness of life. By<br />

investing the brute facts of death with emotional significance, he suggests that it is<br />

imp<strong>or</strong>tant f<strong>or</strong> modern ‘scientific’ man to retain his capacity f<strong>or</strong> wonder, and above<br />

all f<strong>or</strong> sympathy. This poem is ultimately a tribute to the imaginative view of<br />

experience. (86-7, my italics)<br />

In her analysis of “Gentling a Wildcat” Narismulu points to the resolving of dislocation:<br />

“the persona reacts instinctively, and humanely (as well as irrationally) in an integrative<br />

spirit of co-operation, offering comf<strong>or</strong>t, sympathy, and synthesis in response to a<br />

situation of conflict, isolation, suffering and destruction” (154). Narisumulu’s comment<br />

contains too many anthropom<strong>or</strong>phic abstract nouns; it would have been enough to say<br />

‘offering synthesis in response to a situation of suffering and destruction’. (See p 89 f<strong>or</strong><br />

an ecocritical analysis of this poem which expl<strong>or</strong>es the speaker’s anthropom<strong>or</strong>phism.)<br />

The other poems with an animal motif in this collection include “A Bamboo<br />

Day”, “One Elephant”, and ‘Conversation with a Giraffe at Dusk in the Zoo”. Chapman<br />

claims these “do not present such an unremittingly harsh a view of existence” as do the<br />

animal poems in Sjambok (88). This is true of “One Elephant” (an ironic parody of<br />

human nature) and “Conversation with a Giraffe”. But I would argue that “A Bamboo<br />

Day”, through the image of drought and the predat<strong>or</strong>-prey relationship, strikingly depicts<br />

nature as uncaring and so does hark back to the “harsh view of existence” depicted in<br />

Sjambok. This ambivalent view of nature is maintained by Livingstone in all his w<strong>or</strong>k.<br />

In chapter four of his critical study Chapman claims the love poems in A Rosary<br />

of Bone are modelled on 17 th Century English Metaphysical poetry (116), but astutely<br />

adds:<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!