"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
148<br />
evident. The theme of humankind as part of nature, <strong>or</strong> the possibility of a symbiotic<br />
relationship between the two, disappears and is replaced by ecological despair. However,<br />
symbiosis is mentioned twice in the anthology: in a tone of yearning in “Eland About<br />
Station 17” where Livingstone refers to the now marginalized San as “symbiotic man<br />
about / the business of getting on with the earth” (lines 21-2) and as a dire warning of<br />
humanity’s future extinction in “Road Back” where the option is given as “symbiosis <strong>or</strong><br />
death” (line 36) because “The planet counterattacks. / Its choice is plain: kill <strong>or</strong> be killed”<br />
(lines 34-5).<br />
Humankind’s abuse of nature is expl<strong>or</strong>ed through pollution of the Earth<br />
(“Christmas Chefs at Station 1a”), materialistic concerns (“Old Harbour”), cruelty<br />
towards animals (“Beach Terminal”, “Bad Run at King’s Rest” and “Carniv<strong>or</strong>es at<br />
Station 22”) and abuse of other human beings in, amongst others, the holocaust poems<br />
“South Beach Transients” and “The Metallic Aviat<strong>or</strong>”. Ecological destruction through the<br />
erosion of social structures is strongly evident in “Eland About Station 17” and “Children<br />
at Station 16”.<br />
In “Christmas Chefs at Station 1a” (12) the disgusting mess left on the beach<br />
after a Christmas party causes Livingstone to ponder humanity’s imperfections. The tone<br />
of the poem moves from disgust at the “incredible” mess on the beach to despair in the<br />
second and final stanza where he laments humankind’s inability to attain “truth” (line<br />
12). He implies that humanity’s psychic evolution is still in its infancy and that we need<br />
to strive (line 15) to attain the following ideals:<br />
The approximation to justice,<br />
the perfectability of man,<br />
the conservation of beauty,<br />
the final attainment of truth<br />
(lines 9-12)<br />
The argument in these lines is that if humankind could approximate the idea of justice, if<br />
we could understand that man contains the possibility of perfection, and if we could<br />
appreciate and theref<strong>or</strong>e conserve beauty (<strong>or</strong> live ecologically), then we would finally<br />
arrive at “truth”. But these are “salients that ever evade” our consciousness (line 13). The<br />
final three lines expl<strong>or</strong>e this ‘but’. The problem is humanity’s youth, <strong>or</strong> ign<strong>or</strong>ance, which<br />
precludes responsibility. Even though the apprehension of these eternal verities is<br />
“salient”, is a prominent if not vital part of our consciousness, we are too stupid <strong>or</strong>