24.12.2012 Views

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

148<br />

evident. The theme of humankind as part of nature, <strong>or</strong> the possibility of a symbiotic<br />

relationship between the two, disappears and is replaced by ecological despair. However,<br />

symbiosis is mentioned twice in the anthology: in a tone of yearning in “Eland About<br />

Station 17” where Livingstone refers to the now marginalized San as “symbiotic man<br />

about / the business of getting on with the earth” (lines 21-2) and as a dire warning of<br />

humanity’s future extinction in “Road Back” where the option is given as “symbiosis <strong>or</strong><br />

death” (line 36) because “The planet counterattacks. / Its choice is plain: kill <strong>or</strong> be killed”<br />

(lines 34-5).<br />

Humankind’s abuse of nature is expl<strong>or</strong>ed through pollution of the Earth<br />

(“Christmas Chefs at Station 1a”), materialistic concerns (“Old Harbour”), cruelty<br />

towards animals (“Beach Terminal”, “Bad Run at King’s Rest” and “Carniv<strong>or</strong>es at<br />

Station 22”) and abuse of other human beings in, amongst others, the holocaust poems<br />

“South Beach Transients” and “The Metallic Aviat<strong>or</strong>”. Ecological destruction through the<br />

erosion of social structures is strongly evident in “Eland About Station 17” and “Children<br />

at Station 16”.<br />

In “Christmas Chefs at Station 1a” (12) the disgusting mess left on the beach<br />

after a Christmas party causes Livingstone to ponder humanity’s imperfections. The tone<br />

of the poem moves from disgust at the “incredible” mess on the beach to despair in the<br />

second and final stanza where he laments humankind’s inability to attain “truth” (line<br />

12). He implies that humanity’s psychic evolution is still in its infancy and that we need<br />

to strive (line 15) to attain the following ideals:<br />

The approximation to justice,<br />

the perfectability of man,<br />

the conservation of beauty,<br />

the final attainment of truth<br />

(lines 9-12)<br />

The argument in these lines is that if humankind could approximate the idea of justice, if<br />

we could understand that man contains the possibility of perfection, and if we could<br />

appreciate and theref<strong>or</strong>e conserve beauty (<strong>or</strong> live ecologically), then we would finally<br />

arrive at “truth”. But these are “salients that ever evade” our consciousness (line 13). The<br />

final three lines expl<strong>or</strong>e this ‘but’. The problem is humanity’s youth, <strong>or</strong> ign<strong>or</strong>ance, which<br />

precludes responsibility. Even though the apprehension of these eternal verities is<br />

“salient”, is a prominent if not vital part of our consciousness, we are too stupid <strong>or</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!