24.12.2012 Views

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

157<br />

continuation of a species. The poem shows that cultural systems are not always strong<br />

enough to replace the biological <strong>or</strong> instinctual functions necessary to sustain life.<br />

Livingstone first uses death as a connecting link between the starfish and the<br />

malnourished children who suffer from “kwashi<strong>or</strong>k<strong>or</strong>” (line 15). Unlike the dead starfish<br />

human c<strong>or</strong>pses are not beautiful “artefacts” <strong>or</strong> relics of ancient w<strong>or</strong>kmanship. But the<br />

comparison is macabrely extended to describe the effects of kwashi<strong>or</strong>k<strong>or</strong>, where the<br />

extended stomachs of the malnourished children give a sixth point to their bodies (along<br />

with the head, arms and legs) and so give them the shape of a six-pointed “David’s star”<br />

(line 22). Earlier in the poem the starfish is compared to Solomon’s seal (line 11), a<br />

synonym f<strong>or</strong> the Star of David (line 22) (Brewer 1018), and so becomes a symbol f<strong>or</strong> the<br />

ancient religion of Judaism.<br />

In stanza five Livingstone describes the still living children in their too-large castoff<br />

clothes and their “blanched faces” (line 26). Earlier he refers to their “dried-out little<br />

visages” (lines 18-19). Both descriptions poignantly emphasise their suffering f<strong>or</strong> it is<br />

their expressions which are:<br />

... exacting<br />

shrift f<strong>or</strong> inviolable<br />

childhood f<strong>or</strong>ced to war with<br />

intimations of dread.<br />

(lines 27-30)<br />

The “shrift” <strong>or</strong> penance and need f<strong>or</strong> absolution are exacted <strong>or</strong> demanded of humankind<br />

who has abandoned its children. The w<strong>or</strong>d shrift, like the Star of David, has obvious<br />

religious connotations. The Holocaust and its atrocities are evoked through Livingstone's<br />

choice of the Judaic element and the suffering children, while the African w<strong>or</strong>d<br />

“kwashi<strong>or</strong>k<strong>or</strong>” globalises the abuse of the w<strong>or</strong>ld’s children. The poet intimates that<br />

children should be shielded from the terr<strong>or</strong> of abandonment, that childhood should be<br />

“inviolable” and not filled with “intimations of dread”.<br />

The poem thus moves out of the realm of biology into that of faith. This links<br />

with the idea of conscience as a way of righting humankind’s imperfections, specifically<br />

the abandonment of children. This helps to make sense of the concluding lines where the<br />

starfish is a metaph<strong>or</strong> f<strong>or</strong> the abandoned children who are lost to hist<strong>or</strong>y and are devoured<br />

by death and time, figured as the “maws / of sand”.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!