"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
157<br />
continuation of a species. The poem shows that cultural systems are not always strong<br />
enough to replace the biological <strong>or</strong> instinctual functions necessary to sustain life.<br />
Livingstone first uses death as a connecting link between the starfish and the<br />
malnourished children who suffer from “kwashi<strong>or</strong>k<strong>or</strong>” (line 15). Unlike the dead starfish<br />
human c<strong>or</strong>pses are not beautiful “artefacts” <strong>or</strong> relics of ancient w<strong>or</strong>kmanship. But the<br />
comparison is macabrely extended to describe the effects of kwashi<strong>or</strong>k<strong>or</strong>, where the<br />
extended stomachs of the malnourished children give a sixth point to their bodies (along<br />
with the head, arms and legs) and so give them the shape of a six-pointed “David’s star”<br />
(line 22). Earlier in the poem the starfish is compared to Solomon’s seal (line 11), a<br />
synonym f<strong>or</strong> the Star of David (line 22) (Brewer 1018), and so becomes a symbol f<strong>or</strong> the<br />
ancient religion of Judaism.<br />
In stanza five Livingstone describes the still living children in their too-large castoff<br />
clothes and their “blanched faces” (line 26). Earlier he refers to their “dried-out little<br />
visages” (lines 18-19). Both descriptions poignantly emphasise their suffering f<strong>or</strong> it is<br />
their expressions which are:<br />
... exacting<br />
shrift f<strong>or</strong> inviolable<br />
childhood f<strong>or</strong>ced to war with<br />
intimations of dread.<br />
(lines 27-30)<br />
The “shrift” <strong>or</strong> penance and need f<strong>or</strong> absolution are exacted <strong>or</strong> demanded of humankind<br />
who has abandoned its children. The w<strong>or</strong>d shrift, like the Star of David, has obvious<br />
religious connotations. The Holocaust and its atrocities are evoked through Livingstone's<br />
choice of the Judaic element and the suffering children, while the African w<strong>or</strong>d<br />
“kwashi<strong>or</strong>k<strong>or</strong>” globalises the abuse of the w<strong>or</strong>ld’s children. The poet intimates that<br />
children should be shielded from the terr<strong>or</strong> of abandonment, that childhood should be<br />
“inviolable” and not filled with “intimations of dread”.<br />
The poem thus moves out of the realm of biology into that of faith. This links<br />
with the idea of conscience as a way of righting humankind’s imperfections, specifically<br />
the abandonment of children. This helps to make sense of the concluding lines where the<br />
starfish is a metaph<strong>or</strong> f<strong>or</strong> the abandoned children who are lost to hist<strong>or</strong>y and are devoured<br />
by death and time, figured as the “maws / of sand”.