24.12.2012 Views

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4<br />

relatively new science has caught our imagination. This is, at least, a start. I believe it is<br />

the concept of interrelationship which has piqued human curiosity. An ecological<br />

awareness is based on the human ability to commune with the natural w<strong>or</strong>ld. We need to<br />

foster this capacity f<strong>or</strong> ‘communication’ because it leads us to ask where we belong in the<br />

greater scheme of things. These questings concerning have been expressed in human art<br />

since the beginnings of human civilization and the miraculous ecological web of life<br />

should be part of our ponderings. Ecology has, in the latter part of the 20 th Century, been<br />

annexed by literary the<strong>or</strong>ists who have found that an ecologically inf<strong>or</strong>med approach can<br />

offer a m<strong>or</strong>e incisive interpretation of literary texts. This approach has been dubbed<br />

ecological literary criticism (ecocriticism) and it is the the<strong>or</strong>etical basis f<strong>or</strong> this thesis.<br />

While scientific ecology sees humankind as a biological <strong>or</strong>ganism, literary (<strong>or</strong><br />

philosophical) ecology ponders the position of humanity as both part of and apart from<br />

nature. Consciousness has set us apart from the rest of the natural w<strong>or</strong>ld in such a way<br />

that we do not instinctually co-exist with other <strong>or</strong>ganisms. Furtherm<strong>or</strong>e, humanity abuses<br />

the environment f<strong>or</strong> its own gain. The conundrum of why humans are the only animal<br />

which fouls its own nest implicitly inf<strong>or</strong>ms Livingstone’s poetry and causes him to call<br />

man the “clown of creation” (LZ 46), a foolish and uncouth ign<strong>or</strong>amus who does not<br />

know his place within the natural framew<strong>or</strong>k.<br />

I argue that Livingstone, particularly in A Litt<strong>or</strong>al Zone, seeks to remind his<br />

human readers that our survival as a species depends on our understanding that the Earth<br />

is our greater home and that we need to both find and know our place within it. The<br />

Greek roots of the w<strong>or</strong>d ecology (oikos as home <strong>or</strong> dwelling place and logos as relation)<br />

point to this relationship with one’s home <strong>or</strong> dwelling place.<br />

The preceding seems to presuppose that Livingstone was a deep ecologist (see p<br />

18 f<strong>or</strong> a discussion of deep ecology). This is only partly accurate. His poetry is too gritty<br />

and ecologically pragmatic to be labelled deeply ecological. Yet, his reverence f<strong>or</strong> nature<br />

(see the section “What is nature?” p 76) and the Earth is communicated (between the<br />

lines). I argue that he is a Romantic materialist who uses the best of the Romantic<br />

tradition – an appreciative awe of nature and a belief that the human imagination is<br />

crucial – and combines this with an acute scientific awareness (see also p 58). The<br />

material view pervades his poetry through the use of precise scientific w<strong>or</strong>ds (f<strong>or</strong><br />

example: bacillus, isotopes, homoeostasis, crystallogenesis, genetic blueprint, latency,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!