24.12.2012 Views

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

152<br />

emotional aftermath he confronts on returning to the old whaling station. This<br />

aftermath is emphasised in the final w<strong>or</strong>ds of the poem: “a bad prospect”. This literally<br />

refers to a distasteful scene <strong>or</strong> view, but the phrase also contains the idea of the sins of the<br />

past returning to cloud the future. The activities of the whaling station, with its “vats<br />

bubbling” and “crane-chains clattering” (line 29), does not augur well f<strong>or</strong> the future.<br />

(A bigger question outside of the poem is: can humanity exist without exploiting<br />

natural resources? And, if not, can whaling be practised without cruelty?)<br />

“Bad Run at King’s Rest” tells how the poet found a beached and injured<br />

loggerhead turtle and slit its throat to end its misery. The turtle was injured by an “errant<br />

propell<strong>or</strong>-blade” (line 6) and, when beached, had its nails ripped out and eyes “stabbed <strong>or</strong><br />

pecked” out by “some lout’s / hacking” (lines 10-11). In “Beach Terminal” the poet<br />

remembers and recounts the plight of the harpooned whales, whereas here he tells of a<br />

face-to-face encounter with, and the delivering of a coup de grâce f<strong>or</strong>, the suffering<br />

animal. He becomes part of the action of the poem when he slits its throat and “dumbly”<br />

asks f<strong>or</strong> its carcass to be returned to the Earth in the final line. As in “Gentling a Wildcat”<br />

(EC 18) his anthropom<strong>or</strong>phic identification with the animal is shown through his<br />

empathy and need f<strong>or</strong> some kind of burial rite. (See Sacks 4; Brown 2002: 104.) But here<br />

his action is both grisly and courageous. He does not gentle the creature into death. His<br />

killing of the turtle (lines 12 to 15) is described in one sentence and the style flows m<strong>or</strong>e<br />

easily than that of surrounding lines: the poem slips out of sh<strong>or</strong>thand into m<strong>or</strong>e lyrical<br />

lines. The final stanza returns to sh<strong>or</strong>thand and is staccato in style. Despite the cryptic<br />

style, the poet’s reactions are keenly communicated in “Rinse off queasily” (line 16) and<br />

“Circle wide / back, past” (lines 16-17). The prepositions used indicate his disquiet and<br />

anxious avoidance of the dead turtle. He does not want to look too closely at what both he<br />

and other humans have done to the animal. Instead he offers up a mute plea to nature. He<br />

calls on the gulls and the sea to perf<strong>or</strong>m a kind of burial, asks them to dispose of the<br />

carcass through natural means. The w<strong>or</strong>ds “call dumbly” (line 18) indicate an inarticulate<br />

need f<strong>or</strong> some kind of blessing. The lyrical fifth stanza contains the poem’s only use of<br />

the first person pronoun and it is here that the poet communicates his emotion in “asking<br />

pardon” (line 15). Brown briefly notes that the w<strong>or</strong>d “pardon” evokes the religious and<br />

then refers to the interconnection of all life (104). Livingstone seems to be saying that it

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!