"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
152<br />
emotional aftermath he confronts on returning to the old whaling station. This<br />
aftermath is emphasised in the final w<strong>or</strong>ds of the poem: “a bad prospect”. This literally<br />
refers to a distasteful scene <strong>or</strong> view, but the phrase also contains the idea of the sins of the<br />
past returning to cloud the future. The activities of the whaling station, with its “vats<br />
bubbling” and “crane-chains clattering” (line 29), does not augur well f<strong>or</strong> the future.<br />
(A bigger question outside of the poem is: can humanity exist without exploiting<br />
natural resources? And, if not, can whaling be practised without cruelty?)<br />
“Bad Run at King’s Rest” tells how the poet found a beached and injured<br />
loggerhead turtle and slit its throat to end its misery. The turtle was injured by an “errant<br />
propell<strong>or</strong>-blade” (line 6) and, when beached, had its nails ripped out and eyes “stabbed <strong>or</strong><br />
pecked” out by “some lout’s / hacking” (lines 10-11). In “Beach Terminal” the poet<br />
remembers and recounts the plight of the harpooned whales, whereas here he tells of a<br />
face-to-face encounter with, and the delivering of a coup de grâce f<strong>or</strong>, the suffering<br />
animal. He becomes part of the action of the poem when he slits its throat and “dumbly”<br />
asks f<strong>or</strong> its carcass to be returned to the Earth in the final line. As in “Gentling a Wildcat”<br />
(EC 18) his anthropom<strong>or</strong>phic identification with the animal is shown through his<br />
empathy and need f<strong>or</strong> some kind of burial rite. (See Sacks 4; Brown 2002: 104.) But here<br />
his action is both grisly and courageous. He does not gentle the creature into death. His<br />
killing of the turtle (lines 12 to 15) is described in one sentence and the style flows m<strong>or</strong>e<br />
easily than that of surrounding lines: the poem slips out of sh<strong>or</strong>thand into m<strong>or</strong>e lyrical<br />
lines. The final stanza returns to sh<strong>or</strong>thand and is staccato in style. Despite the cryptic<br />
style, the poet’s reactions are keenly communicated in “Rinse off queasily” (line 16) and<br />
“Circle wide / back, past” (lines 16-17). The prepositions used indicate his disquiet and<br />
anxious avoidance of the dead turtle. He does not want to look too closely at what both he<br />
and other humans have done to the animal. Instead he offers up a mute plea to nature. He<br />
calls on the gulls and the sea to perf<strong>or</strong>m a kind of burial, asks them to dispose of the<br />
carcass through natural means. The w<strong>or</strong>ds “call dumbly” (line 18) indicate an inarticulate<br />
need f<strong>or</strong> some kind of blessing. The lyrical fifth stanza contains the poem’s only use of<br />
the first person pronoun and it is here that the poet communicates his emotion in “asking<br />
pardon” (line 15). Brown briefly notes that the w<strong>or</strong>d “pardon” evokes the religious and<br />
then refers to the interconnection of all life (104). Livingstone seems to be saying that it