"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
177<br />
The dead snake lies on the beach beyond the litt<strong>or</strong>al zone (“between / the high-water<br />
mark and the dunes”) and f<strong>or</strong>ms the shape of a question mark. The water snake is literally<br />
stranded and out of its natural habitat, the sea. It is also metaph<strong>or</strong>ically exiled from<br />
“Eden”. Livingstone cryptically conflates the ocean and Eden, <strong>or</strong> evolutionary the<strong>or</strong>y<br />
and creationist the<strong>or</strong>y, and shows the snake to be an outcast from both. He asks his<br />
readers to make a quantum mythological leap from the garden to the sea as the place of<br />
<strong>or</strong>igin of life-f<strong>or</strong>ms. At the same time he asks us to question our understanding <strong>or</strong><br />
apprehension of the nature of paradise and the role of the snake in that paradise. The dead<br />
snake is “Baked dry” and “parched”. This, too, p<strong>or</strong>trays the literal desiccation and<br />
metaph<strong>or</strong>ical dislocation of the figure of the snake. In death, it poses a life question: why<br />
has humanity reviled the snake and refused to see it as part of the web of life? The snake<br />
becomes m<strong>or</strong>e than an ironic question mark in the sand; it signifies that humankind has<br />
denigrated and ign<strong>or</strong>ed the snake as our <strong>or</strong>iginal key to knowledge. It is theref<strong>or</strong>e the<br />
human race which is stranded beyond the highwater mark, without recourse to the litt<strong>or</strong>al<br />
zone where the “physical and psychic can come together” (LZ 62). And the final twist is<br />
that there is (and never was) any hope of reconciliation: “Eden was ever too far f<strong>or</strong> the<br />
crawling back”.<br />
Section III’s examination of the lost Eden is followed by another version of the<br />
search f<strong>or</strong> an earthly paradise in section IV, which alludes to the Biblical great flood,<br />
engineered by God to get rid of the evil on Earth. The deluge myth is rew<strong>or</strong>ked. The<br />
section uses the narrative of a canoeist’s mini-shipwreck and swim f<strong>or</strong> survival. As the<br />
canoe-less speaker swims to sh<strong>or</strong>e he sees a black snake “zig-zagging lithely on the<br />
flood”. The snake survives the flood independently of the ark. If Eden marked<br />
humanity’s fall into the knowledge of good and evil <strong>or</strong>, narrowly, sin, the flood marks an<br />
unsuccessful attempt to get rid of that sin. I do not use sin in the narrow sense of m<strong>or</strong>al<br />
offence, but as part of human knowledge <strong>or</strong> consciousness.<br />
Two figures in this poem show a m<strong>or</strong>e benign, although still confused, attitude<br />
towards the black snake. Section VIII includes the themes of Eden, innocence and<br />
betrayal. It p<strong>or</strong>trays a child’s distress and helplessness in the face of parental strife as he<br />
watches “a black snake squirm down a crack in the rockery”. The snake is a reflection of<br />
the “voices coiling” in argument. Why does the child seek out the snake? Whether literal<br />
<strong>or</strong> figurative, the child’s action of sticking his hand into the viper’s nest is anathema, a