"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
35<br />
universe as mere mechanism” but “feel very strongly that the laws of the universe …<br />
have a very striking and significant kind of beauty” (31). He then carefully discusses the<br />
concept of truth and concludes: “It seems to me that in the quality of truth and beauty one<br />
finds what is really the deepest root of the relationship between science and art” (33).<br />
Livingstone’s rig<strong>or</strong>ously philosophical paper “Science and Truth” examines how<br />
thinkers and scientists have viewed truth and, in concluding, asks “Is the ‘truth’<br />
attainable?” (105). He gives this answer:<br />
It is possible we have to reconcile our pursuit of scientific truth – verifying every<br />
step of the way, imagining it, longing f<strong>or</strong> it, even dreaming of it, spurring<br />
ourselves on with the current the<strong>or</strong>y <strong>or</strong> available ratiocinative device, alert always<br />
f<strong>or</strong> the dissolution of rigidities whose components re-f<strong>or</strong>m into new realities<br />
which will dissolve in their turn – with never actually attaining it. Einstein’s<br />
observation: ‘The most beautiful emotion we can experience is the mystical. It is<br />
the source of all true art and science’, aff<strong>or</strong>ds not only comf<strong>or</strong>t but enjoyment<br />
while the day to day proper business of science ensues, i.e.: seeking after truth,<br />
however evasive the truth happens to be. (106, my italics)<br />
In quoting Einstein, Livingstone also points to beauty and truth as the source of both<br />
science and art. His much-quoted belief that "Science is humanity’s search f<strong>or</strong> truth and<br />
art is humanity’s interpretation of the truth" (Fazzini 1990: 142) is a further indication of<br />
his belief that science and art are not mutually exclusive.<br />
Douglas Livingstone as ecologist<br />
There is no doubt that Douglas Livingstone was both ecologically aware and ecologically<br />
proactive. As scientist, he devoted some 30 years of his life to cleaning up the sea around<br />
Durban. As poet, he communicated his ecological awareness and despair through his<br />
poetry and through talks and articles.<br />
His friend and colleague, Allan Connell, explains how Livingstone’s scientific<br />
w<strong>or</strong>k in microbial analysis of water quality led to clean bathing water at Durban’s<br />
beaches. 9 He pays tribute to Livingstone’s w<strong>or</strong>k as a whole: “Douglas’ dedication to the<br />
9 In an article “In Mem<strong>or</strong>iam: Dr Douglas Livingstone – the Scientist”, Connell explains: “In Durban<br />
Douglas joined a team of scientists studying the health of the marine environment in the vicinity of Durban.<br />
This research preceded the construction of the two maj<strong>or</strong> submarine outfalls constructed in 1978 and 1969<br />
to convey sewage and some industrial effluents several kilometres offsh<strong>or</strong>e, and proved to be an invaluable<br />
yardstick with which to measure the effectiveness of the outfalls in improving the nearsh<strong>or</strong>e and surfzone<br />
water quality. In this the microbial studies of the small team headed by Douglas played a key role as it was<br />
the microbial parameters that had been seriously compromised by the previous disposal practice of<br />
discharging effluent at the mouth of Durban Harbour on the outgoing tide. Even after the pipelines were