24.12.2012 Views

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

35<br />

universe as mere mechanism” but “feel very strongly that the laws of the universe …<br />

have a very striking and significant kind of beauty” (31). He then carefully discusses the<br />

concept of truth and concludes: “It seems to me that in the quality of truth and beauty one<br />

finds what is really the deepest root of the relationship between science and art” (33).<br />

Livingstone’s rig<strong>or</strong>ously philosophical paper “Science and Truth” examines how<br />

thinkers and scientists have viewed truth and, in concluding, asks “Is the ‘truth’<br />

attainable?” (105). He gives this answer:<br />

It is possible we have to reconcile our pursuit of scientific truth – verifying every<br />

step of the way, imagining it, longing f<strong>or</strong> it, even dreaming of it, spurring<br />

ourselves on with the current the<strong>or</strong>y <strong>or</strong> available ratiocinative device, alert always<br />

f<strong>or</strong> the dissolution of rigidities whose components re-f<strong>or</strong>m into new realities<br />

which will dissolve in their turn – with never actually attaining it. Einstein’s<br />

observation: ‘The most beautiful emotion we can experience is the mystical. It is<br />

the source of all true art and science’, aff<strong>or</strong>ds not only comf<strong>or</strong>t but enjoyment<br />

while the day to day proper business of science ensues, i.e.: seeking after truth,<br />

however evasive the truth happens to be. (106, my italics)<br />

In quoting Einstein, Livingstone also points to beauty and truth as the source of both<br />

science and art. His much-quoted belief that "Science is humanity’s search f<strong>or</strong> truth and<br />

art is humanity’s interpretation of the truth" (Fazzini 1990: 142) is a further indication of<br />

his belief that science and art are not mutually exclusive.<br />

Douglas Livingstone as ecologist<br />

There is no doubt that Douglas Livingstone was both ecologically aware and ecologically<br />

proactive. As scientist, he devoted some 30 years of his life to cleaning up the sea around<br />

Durban. As poet, he communicated his ecological awareness and despair through his<br />

poetry and through talks and articles.<br />

His friend and colleague, Allan Connell, explains how Livingstone’s scientific<br />

w<strong>or</strong>k in microbial analysis of water quality led to clean bathing water at Durban’s<br />

beaches. 9 He pays tribute to Livingstone’s w<strong>or</strong>k as a whole: “Douglas’ dedication to the<br />

9 In an article “In Mem<strong>or</strong>iam: Dr Douglas Livingstone – the Scientist”, Connell explains: “In Durban<br />

Douglas joined a team of scientists studying the health of the marine environment in the vicinity of Durban.<br />

This research preceded the construction of the two maj<strong>or</strong> submarine outfalls constructed in 1978 and 1969<br />

to convey sewage and some industrial effluents several kilometres offsh<strong>or</strong>e, and proved to be an invaluable<br />

yardstick with which to measure the effectiveness of the outfalls in improving the nearsh<strong>or</strong>e and surfzone<br />

water quality. In this the microbial studies of the small team headed by Douglas played a key role as it was<br />

the microbial parameters that had been seriously compromised by the previous disposal practice of<br />

discharging effluent at the mouth of Durban Harbour on the outgoing tide. Even after the pipelines were

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!