24.12.2012 Views

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

140<br />

four by “inf<strong>or</strong>med”. The principle of creation, “inf<strong>or</strong>med with m<strong>or</strong>e ahead than<br />

heavens <strong>or</strong> hells” (line 4), thus sets in motion the future of life on the Earth.<br />

The second quatrain offers a description of how life-f<strong>or</strong>ms evolved. The hand of<br />

the creat<strong>or</strong> is still evident f<strong>or</strong> it is said to be “irradiating slime-flecks day by day” (line 5)<br />

and “it watched (with love?)” (line 6) the process of mutation and transf<strong>or</strong>mation of these<br />

bits of slime from the “primeval soups” (line 8) into viable life-f<strong>or</strong>ms with DNA. But the<br />

enigmatic principle’s f<strong>or</strong>mative power <strong>or</strong> active participation appears to wane. It now<br />

stands back and watches the process.<br />

The dense final quatrain deals with evolutionary contingency and “mistakes” (line<br />

10) <strong>or</strong> “unstrung mutations” which led to evolutionary nightmares <strong>or</strong> monsters which did<br />

not survive because “Selection took its toll” (line 10). Selection, the basic principle of<br />

Darwinism, is shown to be a powerful levelling f<strong>or</strong>ce, yet it does not have full control<br />

over free-will <strong>or</strong> the evolution of human consciousness. “Selection took its toll: / free-will<br />

incurs some debts. The debts get paid” (lines 10-12) may be read as a prediction of the<br />

future extinction of the human race <strong>or</strong> as a mistake made by the creat<strong>or</strong>. The lines may<br />

also be read as an ecological statement; that humankind, with its free will, is responsible<br />

f<strong>or</strong> the fate of the Earth. In either case, the process of Darwinian selection supersedes the<br />

role of the “puppet-master” (line 12). Thus, the poem claims, the “enigmatic principle” is<br />

not a controlling <strong>or</strong> omnipotent f<strong>or</strong>ce.<br />

The concluding couplet, in its switch to a personal statement, reflects the poet’s<br />

sense of disconnection from the ‘life f<strong>or</strong>ce’. He is “far from its image” (line 13). Given<br />

the context, this is an allusion to Genesis: “And God said, Let us make man in our image,<br />

after our likeness…” (Gen 1:26). The poet cannot comprehend the idea of God, yet there<br />

are “vestiges” in him which still connect with his <strong>or</strong>igins, “a time I once breathed in its<br />

sea” (line 14), where “its” refers to the Creative <strong>or</strong> “enigmatic principle”.<br />

The implied question of whether the poet, and also humankind, owes its initial<br />

<strong>or</strong>igin to a creat<strong>or</strong> is left open. This is the "nod to God”. The poem offers a clear account<br />

of the process of evolution but hangs a question mark over the creationist expl<strong>or</strong>ation of<br />

<strong>or</strong>igins.<br />

“Address to a Patrician at Station 8” (24) is also about <strong>or</strong>igins, but from the<br />

Darwinian perspective that all life-f<strong>or</strong>ms are descended from a common ancest<strong>or</strong>. It does<br />

not expl<strong>or</strong>e the idea of a creat<strong>or</strong>, but does express awe at the unfolding pattern of life.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!