"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
some include what might conveniently be called traditionally romantic<br />
characteristics. Alan Ross has remarked on Livingstone’s ‘agreeable brand of<br />
romantic cynicism’; he could as well have mentioned that the poet is at times<br />
prepared to view love without a trace of cynicism. (117)<br />
I argue in chapter six of this thesis that Livingstone sees love as a key towards attaining<br />
ecological equilibrium. Chapman hints at this possibility when he claims that love is<br />
firmly defined by the f<strong>or</strong>ces of nature in “Loving” and that the sea evokes a sense of both<br />
tranquillity and mystery. “Love is thus given significant f<strong>or</strong>m in relation to the majestic<br />
rhythms of the natural w<strong>or</strong>ld” (119). Another poem which Chapman links to external<br />
nature is “A M<strong>or</strong>ning”. He expl<strong>or</strong>es it in detail and concludes: “The poet’s own sense of<br />
the wonder of creation is embodied in the image sequences, so that the notion of harmony<br />
between physical and spiritual nature emerges as an emotional experience” (121). He<br />
observes with insight that:<br />
Livingstone, then, views love as both a creative and a destructive passion; it can<br />
synthesize disparate experience, but its failure leads to alienation and despair…<br />
much of his most vital poetry may well arise from feelings of harmony <strong>or</strong><br />
disintegration, which are initially experienced on the very private level of intimate<br />
human relationships. (128)<br />
Unlikely as it may seem, love is essential to ecological health and Chapman is aware of<br />
love’s imp<strong>or</strong>tant synthesising power in Livingstone’s poetry. Klopper refers to “the idea<br />
of relationship, its prospect and failure” as an imp<strong>or</strong>tant aspect of Livingstone’s nature<br />
poetry and says it is elevated to a central concern in his love poetry (1997: 46).<br />
In the final chapter of his critical study Chapman claims The Anvil’s Undertone<br />
marks a “turning outwards … away from the intimate relations to the realized events, the<br />
symbolic images of civilization” (135). He argues:<br />
it is as if both the experience of failed personal relationships and the uneasiness of<br />
the socio-political situation in Southern Africa have, so to speak, f<strong>or</strong>ced the poet<br />
towards a physical and emotional landscape which has affinities with the flinty<br />
terrain evoked so powerfully in Sjambok. (143)<br />
Chapman’s use of the qualifiers “it is as if” and “so to speak” weaken his already thin<br />
argument. It is m<strong>or</strong>e reasonable to say that Livingstone’s “uneasiness” comes from a<br />
global (rather than personal <strong>or</strong> local) awareness of the ecological and environmental crisis<br />
of the 20 th Century. My claim is evidenced by autobiographical and biographical<br />
inf<strong>or</strong>mation (see the section: “Douglas Livingstone as ecologist” p 35). Chapman claims<br />
the undertones of this collection are mostly of existential struggle, desolation and death,<br />
68