24.12.2012 Views

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

127<br />

and decreases the pressure on personal consciousness – that biology stands as threat<br />

to culture but f<strong>or</strong> the self-same reason it renders the meaning of the cultural m<strong>or</strong>e<br />

intense” (209). He adds that Livingstone is present in the poems as both a figure of<br />

culture (as scientist, plain pragmatic man, homespun philosopher, poet, romantic lover<br />

and hero, Quixotic knight errant) and as a biological creature which is part of the<br />

evolutionary process (209). He expl<strong>or</strong>es this tension, <strong>or</strong> contradiction as he calls it, seeing<br />

in it the underlying source of Livingstone’s use of language:<br />

I think it is in the pressure of the contradiction produced by the biological and the<br />

cultural that we can begin to see the sources of Livingstone’s engagement with<br />

language. The contradiction manifests itself in the poems in the f<strong>or</strong>m of counter<br />

disciplines. The biological disciplines the cultural by placing it in the long<br />

sequence of time, and the cultural disciplines the biological by lifting it into the<br />

expressive domain. In the biological register generation and extinction are the<br />

primary figures – in the cultural register these reappear as the expression of<br />

individual realization and of loss. The urge to language – of f<strong>or</strong>mal rhythmic<br />

language – arises where these two disciplines encounter each other in the poet.<br />

…<br />

It is impossible to know whether Livingstone’s engagement with language rose<br />

to meet his sense of the challenge which the longue durée of the biological<br />

process posed to him, <strong>or</strong> whether it was a consistently deepening sense of the<br />

power of language which led him to test his talent against the most severe and<br />

demanding of limits. What is, I think, clear, is that the pivot of his w<strong>or</strong>k lies where<br />

biology spells extinction and language spells survival. (209-10, my italics)<br />

M<strong>or</strong>phet thus points to Livingstone’s tentative hope that, through the communicative<br />

power of the language of art, humankind’s ecological destructiveness may be<br />

apprehended, in both senses of the w<strong>or</strong>d. In M<strong>or</strong>phet’s w<strong>or</strong>ds: “the volume reconstitutes<br />

the language of poetry as prime medium f<strong>or</strong> the realization of the w<strong>or</strong>ld” (210).<br />

M<strong>or</strong>phet criticises the sometimes blunt <strong>or</strong> overexplicit tone, but praises the<br />

collection f<strong>or</strong> its “depth at which the poems provide the poet and his readers with a<br />

measure of a life in this place at this time” (210). Duncan Brown, too, refers to the<br />

imp<strong>or</strong>tance of place: “The crucial manoeuvre – evident in his previous w<strong>or</strong>k, but<br />

becoming explicit and pervasive here – is to refigure the place of humans in the broader<br />

context of biologically conceived, but nevertheless spiritual life” (2002: 98).<br />

In his opening paragraph, Peter Sacks calls A Litt<strong>or</strong>al Zone a superb collection<br />

which is as brilliant, versatile and enthralling as it is sober and menaced (1) and so<br />

immediately points to its underlying tensions. He also writes eloquently of Livingstone’s<br />

ecological preoccupation which is m<strong>or</strong>e sharply evident in A Litt<strong>or</strong>al Zone:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!