24.12.2012 Views

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

n<strong>or</strong>ms and maxims are scalpel-severed<br />

by the sharp, needle-thin lightning,<br />

frightening reason behind the eye,<br />

slivered into land and abstract f<strong>or</strong>ms.<br />

At the end of the poem the speaker uses reason when he decides to heed the “Old saws”<br />

and leave the deceptive shelter of the tree: “There is only one thing to do – / wheel,<br />

stamping, into that brittle rain” and so avoid the danger of being struck by lightning. The<br />

old wisdom <strong>or</strong> folkl<strong>or</strong>e is not isolating, merely practical. Once the speaker of the poem<br />

manages to contain his terr<strong>or</strong> of the st<strong>or</strong>m and regain his reason, the “Old saws” do their<br />

w<strong>or</strong>k and save him. Chapman claims this poem contains<br />

the central paradox of Livingstone’s vision: a striving f<strong>or</strong> <strong>or</strong>der, f<strong>or</strong> ‘reason’, and<br />

the recognition that it may be inadequate to account f<strong>or</strong> the instinctual side of<br />

man’s psyche – the painful awareness that synthesis of man and nature may be<br />

destined to remain illus<strong>or</strong>y. (79) 15<br />

If there is a paradox to be found in this poem, it is that reason reunites the speaker with<br />

his instinctual knowledge. The elusiveness of synthesis between man and nature is<br />

certainly a recurring and predominant Livingstone theme, but it is not to be found, as<br />

Chapman claims, in “St<strong>or</strong>mshelter”.<br />

While Chapman c<strong>or</strong>rectly pinpoints the tension in Livingstone’s w<strong>or</strong>k between<br />

human psychic awareness and the physical w<strong>or</strong>ld, Dirk Klopper gives a m<strong>or</strong>e<br />

sophisticated interpretation of this “paradox”:<br />

The apparent contradiction of engaging ‘physically’ with something as seemingly<br />

inc<strong>or</strong>p<strong>or</strong>eal as ‘consciousness’ serves to convey the paradox of Livingstone’s<br />

poetry as a whole, in as much as this poetry is at once cerebral and sensual,<br />

restrained and intense, serious and ironic. The idea of a consciousness<br />

experienced in the realm of the physical shows that Livingstone’s concerns,<br />

whatever their intellectual content may be, are never far from evincing an<br />

awareness of the body and its non-intellectual modes of perception and<br />

experience. (1997: 44)<br />

Klopper’s observation points to the difficultly of labelling Livingstone’s philosophy and<br />

aptly describes the recurring motif of the tension between the physical and the psychic.<br />

15 Chapman does modify this statement in South African English Poetry: A Modern Perspective (1984)<br />

where he shifts the focus of the paradox he finds in “St<strong>or</strong>mshelter” from the (non)relationship between<br />

“man and nature” to that between humankind and science:<br />

Here we have the central paradox of Livingstone’s insight: there is simultaneously a striving f<strong>or</strong><br />

the ‘<strong>or</strong>dered’ response and a recognition of analysable instincts as well as prim<strong>or</strong>dial visions; it is<br />

yet another variation of man’s dilemma under the dispensation of science. (1984: 108)<br />

62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!