24.12.2012 Views

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

89<br />

poem, indicates that overcoming this repression of the prim<strong>or</strong>dial <strong>or</strong> chthonian element<br />

is not without its pitfalls. Raw Dionysian passion is too much to bear.<br />

In ecological terms, this poem displays a coming together of the biological and<br />

the cultural. The biological is signified through the anatomy of the players, and the<br />

cultural through their music, which becomes “new blues” <strong>or</strong> songs different from the<br />

ancient tunes which were used to hymn the earth. This power of art resurfaces as a theme<br />

in A Litt<strong>or</strong>al Zone.<br />

In “Gentling a Wildcat” (EC 18) 22 and “A Piece of Earth” (AU 47) Livingstone<br />

imagines and anthropom<strong>or</strong>phises the plight of mauled animals. In both poems<br />

Livingstone communicates an unsentimental compassion f<strong>or</strong> the suffering animals, but<br />

shows himself to be powerless against nature’s apparently cruel tide. The wildcat is<br />

savaged by a predat<strong>or</strong> while the blue duiker in “A Piece of Earth” is caught in a human<br />

trap set by a “footloose poacher” (line 14). Nature’s cruelty is juxtaposed with human<br />

cruelty in the latter poem. While Livingstone as speaker is active in “Gentling a Wildcat”,<br />

he is notably absent in the second poem where the Earth, too, “remains unmoving” (line<br />

24). Yet both poems powerfully convey the poet’s communion with the doomed animals<br />

and, by extrapolation, with nature itself. “A Piece of Earth” evokes an antipathy towards<br />

human callousness, f<strong>or</strong> the poacher does not bother to check his trap, is “long gone” and<br />

“will not be returning” (lines 13 and 16). This poem is not so much an indictment on<br />

poaching as on the poacher’s lack of m<strong>or</strong>al sensibility. Livingstone’s anthropom<strong>or</strong>phic<br />

communion with a part of nature is juxtaposed with the trapper’s blatant indifference.<br />

“Gentling a Wildcat” is obversely ecological in that to tame <strong>or</strong> gentle a frenzied<br />

wildcat in its death throes shows Livingstone’s remarkable, almost unbelievable,<br />

atunement with nature. But his act is an exception and makes no difference to the broader<br />

ecological picture. Or does it? This particular wildcat and her cub are long gone, but the<br />

poem and its message live on. The message is difficult to pinpoint. We, as readers, are<br />

not called to gentle dying wildcats, but we are called to appreciate and revere nature’s<br />

cycles. The ecological nub of the poem lies in stanza eight. What is the “something” that<br />

“felt wrong” (line 36)? It is that birth and death should not occur simultaneously because<br />

this goes against nature’s grain. Nature’s “ lifetimes of claws, kaleidoscopes: / moon-<br />

22<br />

No other poems in Eyes Closed Against the Sun appear to deal with the theme of humankind as part of<br />

nature.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!