01.03.2022 Views

CLINICAL LAB SCIENEC

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

244

ESSENTIALS OF CLINICAL LABORATORY SCIENCE

require a rejection of all results followed by troubleshooting protocol. When a

control value moves in the same direction (increases or decreases) for 6 consecutive

days, it is termed a trend. An abrupt change from the established mean is a

shift. A shift may be positive to negative values, or vice versa, but it will all be on

one side of the mean.

QC records are evaluated under Westgard rules or possibly another similar

program. Many analytical instruments are capable of flagging results that fall outside

of the parameters established by the manufacturer of the controls. In the case

where unassayed controls are used, the values may require manually placing data

into the instrument after a period where sufficient values have been performed.

Westgard Rules (Multirules)

Westgard rules (sometimes called challenge rules) are a set of rules to determine

if a method is out of control. This occurs when at least two controls are not

within 2 SDs and the third is within 3 SDs. Preferably all three levels of controls

will be within 2 SDs. Results of laboratory tests must meet the following criteria

before they can be reported or placed on a patient’s chart.

Westgard Rules

1. The warning rule is broken when one control measurement exceeds the

±2 SD guideline. The other rules must now be tested by examining other

control values in the run (within run) and in previous runs (across runs)

before making a decision on the acceptability of the patient results. If any

of the remaining rules are violated, the laboratory professional must thoroughly

examine the test’s analytical procedure, troubleshoot steps in the

procedure, and or perform instrument maintenance, etc. before making any

decision about releasing the results or re-running the test.

2. The within-run only rule detects random error for a control but may also

point to systematic error. The run is considered out of control when one

control value exceeds the ±3 SD limits. But random errors may occur with

no warning and for unknown reasons. Repeating a control when it is out

of range often remedies the situation. Note that random errors for patient

specimens are not detected as this refers only to controls.

3. The two-consecutive control rule is designed to detect systematic error and

can be applied within and across runs. It is violated when two consecutive

control values exceed the same ±2 SD limit.

4. The range rule is applied within the same run only to detect random error.

It is violated when the SD difference between two consecutive control values

exceeds 4 SDs. The 4 SD spread may occur across the mean value and

include both a positive and a negative value from the mean.

5. This rule detects systematic errors and may be used both within and across

runs performed the same day or succeeding days. It is violated within the

control material when the last four control values of the same level exceed

the same ± SD limit. It is violated across control materials when the last four

consecutive controls for different levels exceed the same ±1 SD.

Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).

Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!