01.03.2022 Views

CLINICAL LAB SCIENEC

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

54

ESSENTIALS OF CLINICAL LABORATORY SCIENCE

licensure, as well as two controversial provisions for granting licensure to those

with a bachelor’s degree and 2700 clock hours of experience by September 1,

2006. In addition to “grandfather” laws, a person who has worked 7200 clock

hours, even with no formal college education or additional training other than

on-the-job, can still qualify for licensure as a technologist in New York. And

those who are currently pursuing educational requirements have until September

2011 to complete these requirements.

Much opposition from both local and national groups is focused on professional

licensure for all the categories of laboratory medicine professionals. Hospital

associations, state medical societies, laboratory managers, and a number

of pathologists are averse to any changes in the way laboratory professionals

are categorized and their competence is verified. Many of these groups work

behind the scenes with their state representatives from the position that work is

progressing in a satisfactory fashion so there is no need for licensure. This type

of opposition is probably responsible for the complicated, cumbersome, and difficult

process of documenting the need for licensure, as in Nebraska’s case. Even

some doctoral scientists who are directors of laboratories state that they do the

hiring and firing and believe they can determine the competence and certify the

quality of the work performed in their respective laboratories without further

laws. They maintain that no harm is coming to the public as things are now, so

licensure is not necessary.

In a rare display of unity, several Illinois state societies, with support from

the national offices of some of the professional organizations, began meeting in

1999 on issues of common concern such as personnel licensure. ASCP, ASCLS,

American Association for Clinical Chemistry (AACC), Clinical Laboratory

Management Association (CLMA), Illinois Society for Microbiology (ISM), and

AMT were all in attendance. This is not to say that all were in favor of laboratory

personnel licensure, but at least contemporary issues of interest to the

medical laboratory community were mutually discussed. A bill was eventually

written and introduced in the Illinois legislature, but there was opposition from

the Illinois Society for Pathologists, whose official organization is the College

of American Pathologists (CAP); the American Association of Bioanalysts; the

Illinois Hospital Association; the Illinois State Medical Society; and the Illinois

Department of Professional Regulation. In the face of such pressure from powerful

groups with lobbyists, the bill did not pass. However, it was hoped by those

in favor that the bill would be reintroduced at a later date.

Others states that have recently mounted a strong campaign for laboratory

personnel licensure include Massachusetts, which had a personnel licensure bill

“stuck” in legislative committees in 2004. But strong efforts through ASCLS

continue currently in Massachusetts. Minnesota is trying to educate the population

and to identify those who would oppose legislation for personnel licensure.

A coalition of supporting organizations will work toward that end. Pennsylvania’s

effort failed and efforts were not renewed for a number of years following

strong efforts in the 1990s. In 2004, a coalition of ASCLS Region II states met,

seeking to organize a regional approach from the states of Delaware, New Jersey,

Virginia, and Maryland, and from Washington, DC. West Virginia is also in

Region II but has recently succeeded in obtaining personnel licensure.

Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).

Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!