01.03.2022 Views

CLINICAL LAB SCIENEC

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4

ESSENTIALS OF CLINICAL LABORATORY SCIENCE

diseases related to clinical signs were also observed and recorded several hundred

years ago. In ancient Egypt, diabetes mellitus was diagnosed by determining

if there was a high level of glucose in the urine of patients; this excreted product

was known to attract ants. It is also probable that some physicians tasted the

urine specimens from their patients, if spoken accounts are to be believed, to

determine if the patient had an abnormal amount of glucose in the urine.

Early in the history of the United States and in other countries, blood-letting

was also an acceptable treatment, as it was believed that “bad blood,” or humors

(liquids of the body), could be removed by bleeding the patient. These crude procedures

were practically the only tests available for the physician for centuries.

Many advances were made, including basic specimen examinations, to improve

the practice of laboratory medicine, particularly during the latter part of the

Middle Ages. As a multiplicity of diagnostic tests became available and more

sophisticated test methods were devised, the physician in all probability found it

effective to pass on his knowledge to assistants and other physicians and to rely

on personnel trained to aid him in his diagnoses by performing the necessary

tests, some of which required an interpretation of results.

Many of these earlier developments and discoveries were eventually incorporated

into routine laboratory procedures. Some of the procedures developed

by physicians were obviously shared with others, but it sometimes was years

after the technology became available before the knowledge was disseminated.

And, as with other types of technology, it often takes many years to develop

and refine some of the equipment used to perform laboratory examinations. But

today’s technological advances have changed the very face of laboratory practice

with regularity, although many of the basic tests from years ago, such as urine

analysis and blood counts, still comprise the bulk of routine testing. In the late

1600s, a significant event occurred that provided a great deal of impetus to the

diagnosis of disease. Anton van Leeuwenhoek (October 24, 1632–August 30,

1723) was credited with the development of the first compound microscope,

although there is some evidence to the contrary, and this instrument was sufficient

to enable one to observe blood cells, protozoa, parasites, ova and parasites,

and some bacteria.

Marcello Malpighi (March 10, 1628–September 30, 1694), who was also

working with clinical specimens in the 1600s, no doubt used Leeuwenhoek’s

microscope or earlier versions to begin some of the first pathological examinations

so common today. During the 1800s, cell theory and bacteriology were

established with the help of the microscope, and it was discovered that bacteria

could cause a whole host of devastating diseases. More rapid technological

advances for laboratory medicine have also become available as a result of

progress in space technology and military and industrial needs, where equipment

used in those areas was adapted to perform medical laboratory procedures. For

example, the development of small, solid state equipment was no doubt spurred

by the need to monitor physiological and anatomic changes in astronauts as

they operated in a foreign environment. An example of an industrial need being

adapted for the medical laboratory is that of particle counters originally used

to measure the purity of industrial compounds. Electronic impedance when a

particle passes through a small aperture in the instrument originally used in

Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).

Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!