14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

enforceability <strong>of</strong> security interests in personal property and the determination <strong>of</strong><br />

priority between security interests in the same property. Prior to the passing <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Act, the question <strong>of</strong> priority is determined by a complex relationship between<br />

common law, equitable priority rules and the statute. 112<br />

<strong>The</strong> Act also provides a searchable register, called Personal Property Securities<br />

Register, in order to perfect the security. <strong>The</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> this register provides for<br />

simple and cheaper avenue for creditors to know their priority and their position in<br />

relation to the security. <strong>The</strong> Companies (Amendments) Act 2006 also attempts to<br />

give solutions to the conflict <strong>of</strong> priority under PPSA and schedule 7 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Companies Act 1993. 113<br />

<strong>The</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> Malaysia in 1963 and the growth <strong>of</strong> commercial activities,<br />

prompted the need to review the existing legislation and to have uniform companies<br />

legislation throughout Malaysia. As a result, the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Commerce and Industry<br />

set up a committee on 30 th October 1963 chaired by Raja Mohar bin Raja<br />

Badiozaman (the committee is also known as the Mohar Committee) to recommend<br />

the new Companies legislation in Malaysia. 114 In recommending the new legislation,<br />

the Committee considered legislation in force at the time in England, Australia, India<br />

and New Zealand.<br />

In addition, references were also made to the Cohen Report, the Jenkins Report, the<br />

report and draft code for Ghana prepared by Gower, as well as various comments<br />

112 Farrar, Ibid at [25.1]<br />

113 Schedule 7, para 2(1) (b)(i)(B) <strong>of</strong> the New Zealand Companies Act 1993 as inserted by Schedule 1<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Companies (Amendments) Act 2006 provides that the preferential claims listed in schedule 7<br />

will have priority over the claims <strong>of</strong> any person under the security interest over accounts receivable<br />

and inventory which is not a purchase money security interests that has been perfected at the time<br />

specified in section 74 <strong>of</strong> the Personal Property Securities Act 1999. See also Schedule 7 para 2(1)<br />

(C) <strong>of</strong> the same Act.<br />

114 Malaysia Parliamentary Debates above n70 at 768.<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!