14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

situation, directors have a duty to ensure that the property <strong>of</strong> the company is<br />

sufficient to meet its obligation to the creditors. <strong>The</strong> rationale for imposing a duty to<br />

the company and to creditors is to ensure that the affairs <strong>of</strong> the company are properly<br />

administered and that its property is not dissipated or exploited for the benefit <strong>of</strong> the<br />

directors themselves to the prejudice <strong>of</strong> the creditors.<br />

From the speech <strong>of</strong> Lord Templeman in the case, it seems that a director has a duty<br />

to ensure the company must ensure at all time that it has enough assets to pay<br />

creditors. This duty has been suggested to be either merely reiterating the capital<br />

maintenance principle enunciated in Re Exchange Banking Company 62 (Flitcr<strong>of</strong>t’s<br />

case), or extending the said principle to a duty to guarantee the solvency <strong>of</strong> a<br />

company. 63<br />

Likewise, Street J in Kinsela v Russell Kinsela Pty Ltd 64 recognised creditors‟<br />

interests when the company is insolvent and that any breach by directors in such<br />

circumstances could not be ratified by shareholders. 65 Nevertheless, the judge did not<br />

devise any test to determine the extent <strong>of</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong> financial instability which<br />

would trigger the duty. This question was answered and deliberated further in<br />

Nicholson v Permakraft (N.Z.) Ltd. 66 Cooke J in his judgment 67 held that directors<br />

owed a duty to the company, but if the company is insolvent, near insolvent or <strong>of</strong><br />

62 (1882) 21 Ch D 519.<br />

63 See comments made by Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Farrar in John Farrar “<strong>The</strong> Responsibility <strong>of</strong> Directors and<br />

Shareholders for a Company‟s Debts” (1989) 4 Cant. LR 12 at 14; and also Irene Trethowan in<br />

“Directors‟ Personal Liability to Creditors for a Company Debts” (1992) 20 ABLR 41 at 46.<br />

64 (1986) 10 ACLR 395; (1986) 4 ACLC 215 at 223.<br />

65 See also Re Horsley & Weight Ltd [1982] 1 Ch 442; Re DKG Contractors Ltd [1990] BCC 903;<br />

where the court held that shareholders could not ratify the breach in cases where the company is<br />

insolvent and they would clearly benefit at the expense <strong>of</strong> creditors.<br />

66 [1985] 1 NZLR 243.<br />

67 [1985] 1 NZLR 243 at 249-250.<br />

85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!