14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

defraud, which implies their culpability. <strong>The</strong>refore, the courts must take this factor<br />

into consideration when deciding the appropriate penalty.<br />

It is acknowledged that the creditors‘ position is not likely to be improved since<br />

directors are not making any contributions which will be distributed among them.<br />

However, the punishment meted out by the sections may have both deterrent and<br />

protective measures. Due to the threat <strong>of</strong> a custodial sentence, directors will either<br />

avoid committing the <strong>of</strong>fence in the first place or perpetrating it again. In addition, it<br />

may also serve as a warning to other directors not to commit the act or else suffer the<br />

same fate. Consequently, all other parties including creditors, shareholders and<br />

member <strong>of</strong> the public will benefit from it because directors will be cautious and<br />

accountable in making decisions.<br />

11.3.3 Civil Responsibility for Fraudulent Trading<br />

Under this section, the UK section 213 <strong>of</strong> the Insolvency Act 1986 will be discussed,<br />

together with the Malaysian section 304(1) because only they provide civil liability<br />

for fraudulent trading. <strong>The</strong> juxtaposition <strong>of</strong> the two sections reveals their similarities,<br />

at the same time exposing the huge difference in respect <strong>of</strong> the effects when the<br />

provisions are breached. Section 213 states that those who breach the section "are<br />

liable to make such contributions (if any) to the company‘s assets as the courts think<br />

proper." Section 304(1), on the other hand, stipulates that the person "shall be<br />

personally responsible, without any limitation for all or any <strong>of</strong> the debts or other<br />

liabilities <strong>of</strong> the company as the Court directs."<br />

Section 213 does not explain the extent <strong>of</strong> contributions a director has to make<br />

compared to section 304(1) where a director can be made personally liable for an<br />

See also section 304(5) <strong>of</strong> the Malaysian Companies Act 1965: ―Where any business <strong>of</strong> the<br />

company is carried on with the intent or for the purpose mentioned in subsection (1) every person<br />

who was knowingly a party to the carrying on <strong>of</strong> the business with intent or purpose shall be guilty<br />

<strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fence against this Act.<br />

Penalty: Imprisonment for three years or ten thousand ringgit.‖<br />

333

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!