14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.3.3.1 Directly or Indirectly purchase Its Own Shares<br />

<strong>The</strong> common law position is very strict, and a company is prohibited from<br />

purchasing its own shares even if it is allowed to do so in its Constitution or<br />

authorised by shareholders in the general meeting. 40 <strong>The</strong> underlying principle for<br />

such prohibition is that by purchasing its own shares a company is using its own<br />

financial resources and it is equivalent to reducing its own capital. 41 Lord Hershell<br />

commented that the stringent procedures required in order to reduce share capital<br />

would be futile if companies were allowed to purchase their own shares. 42<br />

<strong>The</strong> common law position is incorporated in the statute and a company is prohibited<br />

from purchasing its own shares except otherwise provided for in the statute. 43 Since<br />

purchasing its own shares amounted to depleting the company‟s assets, the law has<br />

laid down strict procedures that need to be complied with. 44 Section 257A <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Australian Corporations Act 2001 permits the purchase if it does not materially<br />

prejudice the company’s ability to pay its creditors. (Emphasis added).<br />

<strong>The</strong> requirement is related to the company‟s solvency and directors may be subjected<br />

to personal liability under section 588G if conditions stated therewith have been<br />

fulfilled. In Malaysia, in addition to the stringent procedures, there must be a<br />

solvency declaration by the directors that the company is solvent at the time <strong>of</strong><br />

40 Re Exchange Banking Co, Flitcr<strong>of</strong>t’s Case (1882) 21 ChD 519 at 533.<br />

41 Trevor v Whitworth (1887) 12 App Cas 409.<br />

42 Trevor v Whitworth (1887) 12 App Cas 409 at 416.<br />

43 See section 658(1) <strong>of</strong> the UK Companies Act 2006; section 67A <strong>of</strong> the Malaysian Companies Act<br />

1965; section 257A <strong>of</strong> the Australian Corporations Act 2001.<br />

44 Section 690 <strong>of</strong> the UK Companies Act 2006; the procedures are laid down in Chapter 4 <strong>of</strong> the Act;<br />

Part 2J.1 Division 2 <strong>of</strong> the Australian Corporations Act 2001.<br />

158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!