14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

power to do so is an archaic equitable remedy which a creditor exercised in order to<br />

safeguard his or her interests. 3 Initially, the creditor would have to apply to the court<br />

in order to appoint a receiver and later begin to include such right in contracts. <strong>The</strong><br />

appointment <strong>of</strong> a receiver gained popularity at the same time floating charge<br />

obtained legal recognition in the latter part <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century. 4<br />

A receiver owes his or her duty to the debenture holder who makes the appointment,<br />

as seen from the judgment <strong>of</strong> Evershed M.R in Re B Johnson & Co (Builders) Ltd. 5<br />

However, it is acknowledged the company and other creditors also have an interest<br />

in relating to the realization <strong>of</strong> the company‘s assets. In Downsview Nominees Ltd v<br />

First City Corporation Ltd, 6 in an appeal from New Zealand, the Privy Council<br />

reiterated the findings <strong>of</strong> Evershed M.R in Re B Johnson & Co (Builders) Ltd 7 and<br />

held the receiver breach his duty if he abuses the powers conferred in the debenture<br />

to preserve and realize the assets. <strong>The</strong> receiver in the case was appointed not for the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> preserving and realizing assets held under the debenture but to prevent the<br />

plaintiff from enforcing the second debenture. Further, in the absence <strong>of</strong> mala fides<br />

and fraud, the company cannot complain even though the receiver‘s action put the<br />

company or other creditors in a disadvantaged position.<br />

A receivership is used to enforce a charge holder‘s right which means assets subject<br />

to the debenture will not be available to unsecured creditors. 8 <strong>The</strong> usual scenario is at<br />

the twilight <strong>of</strong> financial difficulties, a debenture holder would exercise his or her<br />

3 Bond Brewing Holdings Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd (1990) 1 ACSR 445 at 456.<br />

4 Krishnan Arjunan and Low Chee Keong Lipton & Herzberg’s Understanding Company Law in<br />

Malaysia (LBS Information Services, NSW,1995) at 412.<br />

5 [1955] 2 All ER 775, Evershed M.R at 780 stated ―…not with any duties to carry on the business <strong>of</strong><br />

the company, in the best interests <strong>of</strong> the company, but in order to realise, for the debenture holders<br />

or mortgagees, the security which they had got; and only for that limited purpose is he given the<br />

power <strong>of</strong> management.‖<br />

6 [1993] 1 NZLR 513 at 522-524.<br />

7 [1955] 2 All ER 775.<br />

8 Eilis Ferran ―Floating Charges-<strong>The</strong> Nature <strong>of</strong> the Security‖ (1988) 47 CLJ 213 at 216.<br />

309

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!