14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

creditors have equal bargaining power to that <strong>of</strong> the company. While this may be true<br />

with regard to some creditors such as financial institutions, others are as vulnerable as the<br />

shareholders. 41 So company law has to be adjusted to accept the notion and to take into<br />

account creditors‟ interests in a situation <strong>of</strong> doubtful solvency that is likely to be achieved<br />

if the courts are prepared to accept a more interventionist role to review directors‟<br />

commercial and policy decisions. 42<br />

3.4 Doctrine <strong>of</strong> Capital Maintenance and the Solvency Test<br />

<strong>The</strong> capital maintenance doctrine relies on the capital contributed by shareholders as a<br />

buffer to protect creditors. <strong>The</strong> doctrine, however, does not provide a guarantee that the<br />

company will be solvent throughout its life because the law acknowledges the<br />

vicissitudes <strong>of</strong> business. 43 Creditors have the right to expect that the company will not<br />

reduce or return the assets while the company is a going concern, except in the form <strong>of</strong><br />

dividend payable out <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>its. 44 <strong>The</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> the expectation was that creditors gave<br />

credit to the company on the faith <strong>of</strong> the representation that the capital would be utilized<br />

for the purpose <strong>of</strong> the business. 45<br />

<strong>The</strong> doctrine has been slowly replaced by the solvency test as a means to protect creditors<br />

because it is deemed to be insufficient. One <strong>of</strong> the main reasons for replacing the doctrine<br />

is that the capital set out in the company‟s constitution represents the historical figure<br />

41 David Millman” Priority Rights on Corporate Insolvency” in Clarke A. (Ed.) Current Issues in<br />

Insolvency Law (Stevens and Sons, London, 1991) 57.<br />

42 Len Sealy “Directors Wider Responsibilities- Problems Conceptual, Practical and Procedural” (1987) 13<br />

Monash U.L. Rev. 164)<br />

43 RP Austin and Ian Ramsay Ford’s Principles <strong>of</strong> Corporations Law (14 th ed., Lexis Nexis Butterworths,<br />

NSW, 2010); John Farrar and Brenda Hannigan Farrar’s Company Law (4th ed., Butterworths, London<br />

1998); LCB Gower Modern Company Law (6 th ed., Stevens, London, 1997).<br />

44 Ibid.<br />

45 Ibid.<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!