14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10.6 Duty <strong>of</strong> Directors under Malaysian Law<br />

10.6.1 Introduction<br />

<strong>The</strong> fraudulent trading provision in Malaysia is stated in section 304(1) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Companies Act 1965 and is inherited from section 332 <strong>of</strong> the UK Companies Act<br />

1948. <strong>The</strong> English version <strong>of</strong> fraudulent trading continues to exist in its current<br />

form in section 213 <strong>of</strong> the Insolvency Act 1986 for civil liability, and section 993<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Companies Act 2006 for its criminal liability. Since the provision was<br />

enacted following the old law, any defects <strong>of</strong> the old law which prompted the UK<br />

to amend its legislation remain in section 304(1).<br />

Although the UK has two separate sections on fraudulent trading, there is only<br />

one section which deals with both civil and criminal liability in the Malaysian<br />

Companies Act 1965. One <strong>of</strong> the drawbacks <strong>of</strong> having both criminal and civil<br />

liability in one provision is the tendency <strong>of</strong> the court to apply the higher criminal<br />

standard, resulting in a small number <strong>of</strong> cases being brought to the court. In its<br />

report, the Cork Committee recommended that the fraudulent trading provision<br />

should maintain its criminal liability and a new civil provision be introduced in<br />

the form <strong>of</strong> wrongful trading in section 214.<br />

However, when the Insolvency Act 1986 was enacted, the civil aspect <strong>of</strong><br />

fraudulent trading was maintained in section 213. Due to the similarities in the<br />

wording <strong>of</strong> the provisions, the Malaysian courts have since referred to the English<br />

cases under section 213 in interpreting the elements <strong>of</strong> section 304(1). 272 <strong>The</strong><br />

Singaporean provisions on fraudulent and insolvent trading will also be compared<br />

because they are exactly the same as Malaysia. <strong>The</strong> Singaporean Companies<br />

1967 adopted an Act similar to the Malaysian Companies Act 1965 after its<br />

separation from Malaysia in 1965. Since them various changes have been made<br />

to the Singaporean Act.<br />

272 It should be noted that the elements <strong>of</strong> fraudulent trading in section 993 <strong>of</strong> the UK Companies<br />

Act 2006 are similar to section 213 <strong>of</strong> the UK Insolvency Act 1986.<br />

294

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!