14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

should also facilitate economic activities more generally by providing deterrent to<br />

irresponsible risk taking by directors and contributing to reducing perceptions <strong>of</strong> counter-<br />

party risk in the economy. 11<br />

<strong>The</strong> law performs a valuable public function in contributing to combating fraud and in<br />

maintaining and fostering ethical commercial behavior and standard. 12 <strong>The</strong> debtor‘s<br />

inability to pay its debts as they fall due can be a good indication that the debtor may not<br />

be able to repay any fresh debts it may incur. 13 <strong>The</strong>refore insolvency is a strong<br />

indication that any person who transacts with the company during that time may be<br />

exposing themselves to increased risk <strong>of</strong> loss. 14 Such a person‘s resources would be<br />

better applied to activities involving less risk and contributing to economic growth.<br />

Factors that adversely affect perception <strong>of</strong> credit risk within the market have also<br />

potential to adversely affect economic activities. 15 A decrease in the general level <strong>of</strong><br />

confidence in market solvency may lead to creditors having negative perceptions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

company; the willingness to provide credit (through lending or provide goods and<br />

services on credit); the costs <strong>of</strong> credit and the conditions upon which credit is provided. 16<br />

A clear solvency provision would be able to provide assurance that the company is<br />

solvent and would be able to meet its obligations. 17<br />

Insolvency law may contribute to reducing transaction and monitoring costs. 18 <strong>The</strong><br />

imposition <strong>of</strong> liability helps to reduce monitoring costs because it would encourage<br />

directors to proactively monitor and address the company‘s financial position. In<br />

11 at [1.2]<br />

23 September 2011; see also Roy Goode, Principles <strong>of</strong> Corporate Insolvency Law (Thompson, Sweet &<br />

Maxwell, 2005) at chapter 2; Vanessa Finch Corporate Insolvency Law Perspective and Principles (2 nd<br />

ed, Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press, 2009 at chapter 16; Rizwaan Mokal ‗An Agency Cost analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Wrongful Trading Provisions: Redistribution, Perverse Incentives and the Creditors‘ Bargain‘ (2000) 59<br />

CLJ 335.<br />

12 Ibid, at [3.1];Finch at 677.<br />

13 Ibid, at [3.2].<br />

14 Ibid, at [3.3]-[3.4].<br />

15 Ibid, at[3.3]-[3.4]<br />

16 Ibid, at [3.9]<br />

17 Ibid, at [3.9]-[3.10].<br />

18 Ibid, at [3.10].<br />

441

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!