14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

justice alone is not sufficient; there must be other elements, such as fraud, present<br />

before the veil will be lifted.<br />

In cases where undertakings have been given by directors <strong>of</strong> both parent and<br />

subsidiary, the court will scrutinise on whose behalf they are acting. It is also<br />

interesting to note that recent decisions <strong>of</strong> the courts open the possibility that the<br />

separate legal entity principle will be ignored. <strong>The</strong> courts have relied on other<br />

principles, such as estoppel, in order to make the parent company liable for the debts<br />

<strong>of</strong> its subsidiary.<br />

It is apparent that the courts in Malaysia have been influenced by the English courts<br />

and it is submitted that the trends will continue. As such, any developments in the<br />

area will have great impact on Malaysian corporate law. Parliament has been<br />

reluctant to intervene in the area <strong>of</strong> corporate personality and the matters have been<br />

left to judges to decide, as and when necessary, to depart from the separate legal<br />

entity doctrine. <strong>The</strong> courts, therefore, will have to look elsewhere for guidance, and<br />

any developments in common law jurisdictions have become their primary source <strong>of</strong><br />

reference.<br />

117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!