14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Malaysia did not make any changes on this area and still retains the fraudulent<br />

trading provision which is a replica <strong>of</strong> the UK Companies Act 1948. It also<br />

maintains the insolvency provision adopted from Australia. <strong>The</strong> Malaysian<br />

Corporate Law Reform Committee (CLRC) had the opportunity to make changes<br />

in 2004 but did not propose any amendments to the section. Also, the<br />

circumstances as to when directors are held to be personally liable are different in<br />

each jurisdiction. It should be noted that the legislation started by imposing<br />

criminal liability with the main focus <strong>of</strong> punishing the person responsible. In the<br />

succeeding period, the focus shifted to compensating those who suffered losses,<br />

particularly the creditors who are most affected by the directors‟ action. This<br />

change indicates the recognition that other parties in the company also require<br />

protection from the company.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first section <strong>of</strong> this chapter will provide comparative analyses <strong>of</strong> the three<br />

systems, particularly <strong>of</strong> the elements to be proven in proceedings against<br />

directors. Issues on remedies and the consequences <strong>of</strong> breaching the sections will<br />

be examined in the next chapter. <strong>The</strong> section will look at each jurisdiction in<br />

detail and see how the courts interpret the sections. <strong>The</strong> last section will explore<br />

the Malaysian law in respect <strong>of</strong> the duty to prevent insolvent trading, and make<br />

suggestions whenever necessary.<br />

10.2 Comparative Aspects<br />

Directors can be subjected to personal liability if they fail to prevent the company<br />

from engaging in insolvent trading. In the UK, the provision which imposes such<br />

an obligation on directors is known as „wrongful‟ trading, 10 „reckless‟ trading 11<br />

(in New Zealand), and „insolvent‟ trading 12 (in Australia). <strong>The</strong> three provisions<br />

generally impose a duty on directors to prevent companies from engaging in<br />

business activities when the company is insolvent, although the elements which<br />

trigger <strong>of</strong>f such a duty differ from one another.<br />

10 Section 214 <strong>of</strong> the UK Insolvency Act 1986.<br />

11 Section 135 <strong>of</strong> the New Zealand Companies Act 1993.<br />

12 Section 588G <strong>of</strong> the Australian Corporations Act 2001.<br />

227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!