14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

insist on protection to directors in discharging their duties by including the business<br />

judgment rule is to protect honest directors and also to dissuade them from leaving<br />

the company so that they will continue to use their skills to manage the company. 216<br />

This is consistent with one <strong>of</strong> the objectives <strong>of</strong> company legislation which is to<br />

facilitate commerce. <strong>The</strong> committee did not address specifically the issue <strong>of</strong><br />

directors‟ duties in insolvent situations; instead, the emphasis was on the need to<br />

incorporate director‟s common law duties for proper purpose and in good faith in the<br />

interests <strong>of</strong> the company into the Act. <strong>The</strong> priority <strong>of</strong> the committee, it seems, is not<br />

the person who is responsible for the company‟s dire financial state, but on how to<br />

salvage the company. Hence, in the area <strong>of</strong> corporate insolvency reform, the<br />

committee emphasized the need to have rehabilitation measures in addition to the<br />

provisions in section 176. As such, directors‟ liability in insolvent situations<br />

continued to be governed by section 303(3) and section 304, which are based on the<br />

English 1948 Act.<br />

<strong>The</strong> influences <strong>of</strong> English law in Malaysian courts remain steadfast, although the<br />

decisions by English courts are only persuasive and not binding. In addition, English<br />

commercial law will be applicable in Malaysia, provided there is a lacuna in the law<br />

and so long as the law is appropriate to the local circumstances. Section 5(1) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Civil Law Act 1956 stipulates that the law in England as at 7 April 1956 is<br />

applicable in all States in Malaysia except for Penang and Malacca. In Sabah,<br />

Sarawak, Penang and Malacca, section 5(2) <strong>of</strong> the Civil Law Act 1956 allows<br />

continuing reliance on the current English law. Although section 5(2) allows for the<br />

continuing reception <strong>of</strong> English commercial law in the four states, in practice, judges<br />

seldom refer to the provision in section 5 when making decisions and do not make<br />

distinctions as to where the cases took place.<br />

216 CLRC Clarifying and Reformulating the Directors‟ Role Duties above n213 at [3.18].<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!