14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

its assets are insufficient to pay its liabilities, 273 or an administration order has been<br />

made, 274 or an administrative receiver has been appointed. 275<br />

<strong>The</strong> same can be said <strong>of</strong> the New Zealand provision which laid down the<br />

circumstances in which the disqualification provision can be used. In Australia,<br />

section 206D(1) empowers the court to make the order if it is satisfied that the<br />

manner in which the company was managed contributed to its failure, either wholly<br />

or partly. <strong>The</strong> meaning <strong>of</strong> the word ‗failure‘ in this context is described in the<br />

following section 206D(2) and generally is similar to those circumstances listed by<br />

the UK and the New Zealand Act. In Malaysia, however, the application <strong>of</strong> the<br />

section is restricted to two or more companies which are in liquidation.<br />

In New Zealand, section 385 gives powers to the Registrar to disqualify a person by<br />

giving him or her notice informing <strong>of</strong> such disqualification, if the Registrar is<br />

satisfied that the conditions listed in section 385(4) have been fulfilled. In contrast,<br />

the other three jurisdictions empower the court to make the disqualification order. In<br />

the UK, an application to the court can be made depending on the company‘s<br />

situation, by the Official Receiver, liquidator, administrator or the administrative<br />

receiver. 276 In Australia, the power is exercised by ASIC 277 while, in Malaysia, it is<br />

273 See section 6(2)( a) <strong>of</strong> the UK Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.<br />

274 See section 6(2)( b) <strong>of</strong> the UK Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.<br />

275 See section 6(2)( c) <strong>of</strong> the UK Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.<br />

276 Section 7(3) <strong>of</strong> the UK Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 – ―If it appears to the <strong>of</strong>ficeholder<br />

responsible under this section, that is to say—<br />

(a) in the case <strong>of</strong> a company which is being wound up by the court in England and Wales, the <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />

receiver,<br />

(b) in the case <strong>of</strong> a company which is being wound up otherwise, the liquidator,<br />

(c) in the case <strong>of</strong> a company in relation to which an administration order is in force, the administrator,<br />

or<br />

(d) in the case <strong>of</strong> a company <strong>of</strong> which there is an administrative receiver, that receiver.‖<br />

277 Section 206C and section 206D <strong>of</strong> the Australian Corporations Act 2001.<br />

378

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!