14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

case, directors should disclose their interests in the assets to the<br />

company. 77<br />

Directors also breach their duty if they received a bribe or secret commission from a<br />

third party so that the company will act in accordance with the third party‟s wishes. 78<br />

In Simmah Timber Industries Sdn Bhd v David Low See Keat & Ors, 79 the first<br />

defendant, who was the director, and the second defendant entered into a lease-back<br />

agreement with the company. <strong>The</strong> first defendant had obtained shares in the<br />

company in exchange for transferring the company‟s assets to the second defendant.<br />

As a result <strong>of</strong> the transfer, the first defendant controlled the company. <strong>The</strong> first<br />

defendant later entered into a sub-lease agreement with the second defendant in<br />

which payments were to be made to the company. <strong>The</strong> first defendant, however, took<br />

the payment under the sub-lease and did not account for it to the company. <strong>The</strong> court<br />

has described the arrangement as a "cleverly planned subterfuge to deplete the<br />

company‟s funds" and found that fraud has been committed on the company by its<br />

director. <strong>The</strong> court held that the director had breached his duty to the company by<br />

making secret pr<strong>of</strong>its. In this case, although it was the company which had been<br />

injured through depletion <strong>of</strong> its funds, creditors were also affected since it<br />

undermined the company‟s ability to pay its creditors.<br />

Misuse <strong>of</strong> the company‟s funds is another instance where directors‟ breach <strong>of</strong> duty<br />

directly affects creditors if it results in the company having difficulty in paying its<br />

creditors. In Paul A Davies (Aust) Pty Ltd v Davies, 80 the directors were found to<br />

have breached their duty by using the company‟s funds for their own purpose. <strong>The</strong><br />

directors in the case had decided to venture into a new business due to the economic<br />

downturn. <strong>The</strong> directors obtained an interest free loan from the company. <strong>The</strong><br />

77 See Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1942] 1 All ER 378.<br />

78 Mahesan v Malaysian Government Officers Cooperative Housing Society [1978] 1 MLJ 149.<br />

79 [1999] 5 MLJ 421.<br />

80 (1983) 1 ACLC 1091.<br />

205

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!