14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the Committee concluded that adopting the stakeholders‟ maximisation theory in place <strong>of</strong><br />

the existing framework would involve radical change to the British corporate cultures and<br />

would not gain support. Nevertheless, the Committee suggested a compromise and it was<br />

then enacted by Parliament. <strong>The</strong> current section 172 <strong>of</strong> the Companies Act 2006 requires<br />

directors to take into consideration the wider community‟s interests but at the same time<br />

insists that the primary duty is still owed to shareholders-owners.<br />

Economic literature refers to the relationship between owners <strong>of</strong> the company<br />

(shareholders) and the persons who manage it (directors) as agency. 30 <strong>The</strong> integral<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> agency is the divergence <strong>of</strong> interests between owners and management. 31<br />

<strong>The</strong> competing interests between parties create agency costs, which are the costs incurred<br />

to monitor the agent. 32 <strong>The</strong> recognition <strong>of</strong> the management‟s tendency to diverge from<br />

the interests <strong>of</strong> shareholders as owners prompts the need for shareholders and company<br />

laws to devise strategies to minimise the agency cost. 33 Economic literature regards<br />

limited liability as efficient in this circumstance because it reduces the monitoring costs<br />

on both the directors and other shareholders. 34 In addition, limited liability allows<br />

investors to make optimal decisions regarding investments which they may otherwise not<br />

take but which are beneficial to society as a whole. 35<br />

30 Rickett at 73; Michael Jensen and William Meckling “<strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency<br />

costs and ownership structure” (1976) 3 J Finan.Econ 305 at 308-310.<br />

31 Ibid.<br />

32 Ibid.<br />

33 Ibid.<br />

34 Paul Halpern Michael Trebilcock and Stuart Turnbull “An Economic Analysis <strong>of</strong> Limited Liability in<br />

Corporation Law” (1980) 30 Uni. Toronto L.J 117 at 139-142; Easterbrook and Fischel “<strong>The</strong> Corporate<br />

Contract” above n17 at 1426-1434; Frank H Easterbrook and Daniel R Fischel “Limited Liability and the<br />

Corporation” (1985) 52 Uni. Chi L.Rev 89 at 103-109; Ian M Ramsay “Holding Company Liability for<br />

the Debts <strong>of</strong> an Insolvent Company: A Law and Economic Perspective” (1994) 17 UNSWLJ 520 at 535-<br />

537; Eugene F Fama “Agency Problems and the <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> the Firm” (1980) 88 J. Polit. Economy 288 at<br />

290-292.<br />

35 Ibid.<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!