14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

amounts. 223 In Hussein v Good, 224 the Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> Victoria excluded<br />

contingent debts and its meaning was limited to only a debt owed immediately<br />

after it was incurred. In contrast, the Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> New South Wales in<br />

Hawkins v Bank <strong>of</strong> China 225 concluded that the word debt could include<br />

contingent debts. In Bans Pty Ltd v Ling, 226 it was decided that whether<br />

contingencies should be included has to be evaluated in a practical and<br />

commonsense manner. 227<br />

Hodgson J in Standard Chartered Bank <strong>of</strong> Australia v Antico 228 , stated that a<br />

company incurs a debt when " by its choice, it does or omits something, which as<br />

a matter <strong>of</strong> substance and commercial reality renders it liable for debts which<br />

otherwise it would not have been liable." This decision has been suggested that,<br />

for the section to be applied, there needs to be some positive acts on the part <strong>of</strong><br />

the company to bring the debt into existence. 229 <strong>The</strong>refore, only debts deemed to<br />

be voluntary, such as contractual debts, are included, while others, such as<br />

payment for damages, are not. 230 Hence, the application <strong>of</strong> the section is limited<br />

which means involuntary creditors or torts claimants are not protected.<br />

10.5.2.2 When debt is incurred<br />

It is crucial to determine when a company incurs a debt because that is the time<br />

when the liquidator or a creditor has to show that there are reasonable grounds to<br />

223 See Hawkins v Bank <strong>of</strong> China (1992) 7 ACSR 349.<br />

224 (1990) 1 ACSR 710.<br />

225 (1992) 7 ACSR 349.<br />

226 (1995) 16 ACSR 404 (408).<br />

227 <strong>The</strong> decision is also consistent with the concept <strong>of</strong> „substance and commercial reality‟ in<br />

Standard Chartered Bank <strong>of</strong> Australia v Antico (1995) 131 ALR 1.<br />

228 (1995) 131 ALR 1.<br />

229 Niall F Coburn “Insolvent Trading in Australia: <strong>The</strong> Legal Principles” in Ian M Ramsay (Ed.)<br />

Company Directors’ Liability for Insolvent Trading (CCH Australia Ltd, Centre For<br />

Corporate Law and Securities Regulation, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Law, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Melbourne, 2000)<br />

73 at 96; see also reference therein; Austin and Ramsay above n34 at [20- 090].<br />

230 Ibid.<br />

281

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!