14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11.4.2.2 Court’s Order<br />

Section 6 <strong>of</strong> the CDDA empowers the courts to impose a disqualification for a<br />

minimum period <strong>of</strong> two years and a maximum period <strong>of</strong> 15 years. 314 <strong>The</strong> court has to<br />

impose a mandatory minimum period <strong>of</strong> two years if the conditions laid down in the<br />

section are fulfilled. 315 Section 6(1)(b) entitles the court to order disqualification<br />

either by reference to a director‘s conduct as director <strong>of</strong> the insolvent company alone<br />

or by reference to his conduct <strong>of</strong> other companies as well. <strong>The</strong> section does not give<br />

the court discretion to refuse to make a disqualification order on the basis that the<br />

conduct <strong>of</strong> a director in relation to companies other than the insolvent ones is<br />

appropriate. 316<br />

<strong>The</strong> maximum period <strong>of</strong> disqualification a court can impose on a person who had<br />

been found liable to contribute to the company under section 213 or section 214 <strong>of</strong><br />

the Insolvency Act 1986, is 15 years. 317 <strong>The</strong> difference between section 6 and section<br />

10 in this aspect is under section 10, where the court, on its own initiative, can<br />

impose the disqualification order on the director and there is no mandatory minimum<br />

period <strong>of</strong> two years.<br />

In Australia, section 206C does not provide any limitation on the period <strong>of</strong><br />

disqualification. This is evident when the section merely states that "the court may<br />

disqualify a person" and does not impose any specific period. Thus, it is possible to<br />

impose a permanent disqualification on directors as seen in the case <strong>of</strong> Australian<br />

Securities and Investments Commission v White. 318 In contrast, under section 206D,<br />

the maximum period a court can disqualify a person is seven years as seen in the<br />

314 Section 6 (4) <strong>of</strong> the UK Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.<br />

315 Re Bath Glass [1988] BCLC 329 at 333.<br />

316 Re Bath Glass [1988] BCLC 329 at 333.<br />

317 Section 10(2) <strong>of</strong> the UK Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.<br />

318 (2006) 58 ACSR 261; see also Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Maxwell<br />

(2006) 59 ACSR 373 where one <strong>of</strong> the directors was imposed with permanent disqualification.<br />

387

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!