14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> importation <strong>of</strong> the US concept <strong>of</strong> rationality into the Australian law and the<br />

difficulty <strong>of</strong> interpretation may affect the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the Malaysian business<br />

judgement rule. This is because the uses <strong>of</strong> the objective test and reasonableness in<br />

relation to director‟s duty has been long established by both statute and the common<br />

law. Directors are generally protected from liability if the decisions they made<br />

reasonably in the interest <strong>of</strong> the company. Hence, there is a possibility that directors<br />

will be held liable for decisions which are rational, i.e. which have logical basis but<br />

are not what reasonable directors would have taken. In this situation, the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

introducing the rule will be futile, since for directors the existing laws are sufficient<br />

to cover the reasonable situation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> requirement that directors should be appropriately informed <strong>of</strong> the subject matter<br />

will encourage directors to make responsible decisions. <strong>The</strong> new amendment to the<br />

Act also provides that directors may rely on the reasonable information provided by<br />

a third party in exercising their duty. 123 In doing so, directors must be cautious <strong>of</strong> the<br />

additional costs that the company may incur and evaluate whether it is worthwhile<br />

since costs are also one <strong>of</strong> the factors that directors must consider before making<br />

decisions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> requirement that the decisions must be made in good faith and for a proper<br />

purpose is consistent with the fiduciary duty required from directors. <strong>The</strong> existence<br />

<strong>of</strong> this rule is to ensure that the decisions are not made with improper motives such<br />

as to transfer wealth from the company to the directors. Creditors are indirectly<br />

protected since they can be assured that any decisions must be in accordance with the<br />

objectives <strong>of</strong> the company, which they have knowledge <strong>of</strong> and approve <strong>of</strong> before<br />

deciding to advance credit.<br />

Directors are also required to obtain relevant information before any decision is<br />

reached. <strong>The</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> relevant information may assist directors to determine<br />

123 See sections 132(1C) and (1D) <strong>of</strong> the Malaysian Companies Act 1965.<br />

214

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!