14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

courts were also granted powers under these Acts to investigate, to ascertain the<br />

causes <strong>of</strong> the companies‟ failures and to discover any abuses inflicted on them.<br />

Members were personally liable for the companies‟ debts because, at the time,<br />

limited liability had not been available to all companies.<br />

Some provisions in Australian legislation on joint stock companies and their<br />

winding-up preceded the legislation in England; for example, the provisions<br />

contained in the Absent Debtors Act were passed in New South Wales in 1840 while<br />

the legislation in England with the same provisions was passed in 1844. 182 <strong>The</strong><br />

Absent Debtors Act 1840 permitted an action being instituted against members <strong>of</strong> a<br />

partnership as representatives without having to name every member in the suit,<br />

which was not available to creditors in England until 1844. 183<br />

<strong>The</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> the principle <strong>of</strong> limited liability by the UK Limited Liability Act<br />

1855 marked a new beginning in the history <strong>of</strong> company law. <strong>The</strong> Act conferred<br />

limited liability on members <strong>of</strong> the company and the concept <strong>of</strong> corporate personality<br />

was introduced. <strong>The</strong> UK Companies Act 1862 simplified the procedures for<br />

companies to obtain limited liability status by complying with the statutory formality<br />

<strong>of</strong> registration. 184 <strong>The</strong> Act provided detailed winding up procedures including the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> the bankruptcy pari passu principles into corporate insolvency and<br />

imposing personal liability on the directors or <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> the company who, in the<br />

course <strong>of</strong> winding up, proved guilty <strong>of</strong> misfeasance. 185 In addition, the courts were to<br />

have regard to the wishes <strong>of</strong> creditors and contributories when making an order for<br />

compulsory winding up. 186<br />

182 Keay above n97 at 21.<br />

183 Ibid.<br />

184 Cork Report n 74 above at [76].<br />

185 Holdsworth A History above n147 at 58.<br />

186 Ibid.<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!