14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Similar arguments were made by the court in Re Bank <strong>of</strong> Credit and Commerce<br />

International SA (in liq) (No 15); Morris and others v Bank <strong>of</strong> India. 175 Patten J<br />

concluded that the award can only be estimated for the damages to which the director<br />

has contributed or caused. Despite the compensatory nature <strong>of</strong> the award, it is<br />

essential for the court to assess the degree <strong>of</strong> the director‘s fault or culpability for the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> calculating the quantum.<br />

In Malaysia, debts which directors are held to be liable for are those incurred prior to<br />

fraudulent trading, while in other jurisdictions, only loss suffered after the act is<br />

considered. <strong>The</strong> fraudulent action was discovered while creditors were taking an<br />

action or enforcing judgments which already existed against the company. <strong>The</strong><br />

creditors then brought an action under section 304(1) for a declaration <strong>of</strong> personal<br />

liability. 176 <strong>The</strong> link in these cases is that, due to the fraudulent act, the company<br />

could not pay for the existing claims or judgment sums.<br />

In Australia, the statute requires the court to be satisfied that there is a link between<br />

loss and insolvency before an order for compensation can be made. 177 <strong>The</strong> emphasis<br />

on the company‘s insolvency in the Australian statute indicates that the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

award should be sums not recoverable from the company‘s pools <strong>of</strong> assets when it is<br />

in liquidation. 178<br />

This is illustrated in the decision <strong>of</strong> Metropolitan Fire Systems Pty Ltd v Miller 179 ,<br />

where Metropolitan was able to recover the whole debt due to it from the director<br />

175 [2004] 2 BCLC 279 at 356.<br />

176 Siow Yoon Keong v H Rosen Engineering BV [2003] 4 MLJ 569; LMW Electronics Pte Ltd v Ang<br />

Chuang Juay & Ors[2010] 1 MLJ 185.<br />

177 See sections 588J(1)(c); 588K(b) (ii); 588M(1) (b) <strong>of</strong> the Australian Corporations Act 2001 ― the<br />

person to whom the debt is owed has suffered loss or damage in relation to the debt because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

company‘s insolvency‖.<br />

178 Austin and Ramsay above n22 at [20.150].<br />

179 (1997) 23 ACSR 699.<br />

350

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!