14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ight to appoint a receiver. <strong>The</strong> receiver would then collect the assets, realize and<br />

distribute them to the debenture holders. 9<br />

Consequently, the unsecured creditor would not benefit from the mechanism unless<br />

the debenture holder surrendered the assets to the company for the benefit <strong>of</strong> the<br />

general creditors. <strong>The</strong> unsecured creditors <strong>of</strong>ten find themselves at a disadvantage<br />

because once a receiver is appointed, there is a possibility he or she would expedite<br />

the processes to dispose the assets, pay the debenture holder and discharge the duty.<br />

In doing so, the receiver has, in most cases, deprived unsecured creditors <strong>of</strong> the<br />

opportunity to maximize the amount paid to them. This is because when a receiver<br />

rushes in to realize the property, it also prevents the company with high potential to<br />

survive from being saved.<br />

In some instances, even if the company is sold eventually, it may attract a higher<br />

value than if it is dismantled and sold in pieces. <strong>The</strong> unsecured creditors in this<br />

circumstance do not have any legal redress. <strong>The</strong>y could not make use <strong>of</strong> the court-<br />

appointed receiver because it has been shown that court had no power to permit the<br />

appointment <strong>of</strong> a receiver to manage the affairs <strong>of</strong> the company when the company is<br />

in financial difficulties. 10 <strong>The</strong> right to do so is only conferred on the debenture<br />

holders whose security is at risk.<br />

<strong>The</strong> court rejected an application by the unsecured creditor in Bond Brewing<br />

Holdings Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd 11 to appoint a receiver. <strong>The</strong> bank in the<br />

case had lent on an unsecured basis and was concerned that the company was<br />

disposing <strong>of</strong> its assets to the prejudice <strong>of</strong> the applicant. <strong>The</strong> judge has to be cautious<br />

in appointing a receiver since it empowers the receiver to deal with the property<br />

without company‘s consent. A receivership in this context is equivalent to the<br />

invasion <strong>of</strong> the company‘s privacy and has long lasting effect, although the process<br />

9 Ibid.<br />

10 Bond Brewing Holdings Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd (1990) 1 ACSR 445.<br />

11 (1990) 1 ACSR 445 at 456-458.<br />

310

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!