14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a liability only to the extent <strong>of</strong> the unpaid amount <strong>of</strong> their value <strong>of</strong> shares in the<br />

company. When limited liability was first introduced, there had been sustained<br />

resistance 21 but it has survived till today. It continues to exist because <strong>of</strong> the need to<br />

encourage contributions <strong>of</strong> capital from the public in order to finance extensive<br />

investments, while at the same time not exposing their entire personal wealth. 22<br />

5.2.1 Separate Legal Entities<br />

In 1897, the House <strong>of</strong> Lords pronounced a decision which later became the<br />

foundation <strong>of</strong> modern company law, and the implication <strong>of</strong> such decision is still a<br />

major debate among legal scholars. 23 <strong>The</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> limited liability was not fully<br />

realised until the decision in Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd, 24 where the court<br />

recognised a one-man company. 25 Lord Macnaghten, in a famous judgment held:<br />

<strong>The</strong> company is at law a different person altogether from subscribers…; and<br />

though it may be that after incorporation the business is precisely the same as<br />

it was before, and the same persons are managers, and the same hands receive<br />

the pr<strong>of</strong>its, the company is not in law the agent <strong>of</strong> the subscribers or trustee<br />

for them. Nor are the subscribers, as members, liable in any shape or form,<br />

except to the extent and manner provided in the Act. 26<br />

21 Adam Smith in his book <strong>The</strong> Wealth <strong>of</strong> Nations (733-758) wrote that principle would allow a third<br />

party to manage public‟s money and who would then use it negligently and pr<strong>of</strong>usely-W.R Cornish<br />

and G.de.N Clark Law and Society in England 1750-1950 (Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1989) at<br />

247.<br />

22 Ibid; see also Otto Kahn-Freund “Some Reflections on Company Law Reform” (1944) 7 MLR 54<br />

at 54.<br />

23 Kahn-Freud above n2. <strong>The</strong> writer described the decision in Salomon v Salomon Co Ltd as a<br />

calamitous one which changed the intended purpose <strong>of</strong> corporate personality from being to enable<br />

capitalists to embark on risky adventure without shouldering personal liability to allowing a sole<br />

trader taking advantage to set up limited company even though no risk and outside capital were<br />

involved.<br />

24 [1897] A.C. 22.<br />

25 Gower above n4 at 85.<br />

26 [1897] A.C. 22 at 51.<br />

76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!