14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

compensatory. 163 Damages are assessed on a broad global approach and apportioned<br />

to defendants based on the principle <strong>of</strong> just deserts. <strong>The</strong> method <strong>of</strong> assessing the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> contribution requires a broad global approach with the final sum<br />

remaining at the discretion <strong>of</strong> the court. As such, the court held the defendants liable<br />

to contribute to the assets <strong>of</strong> the company and considered this to be just deserts.<br />

<strong>The</strong> court in Vinyl Processors (New Zealand) Ltd v Cant 164 made reference to Maloc<br />

Construction Ltd v Chadwick Lovegrove and Burr 165 in a situation where the<br />

company failed to keep proper financial reports which stated that in the event that<br />

arithmetical assessment is impossible, the court should use the broad global method.<br />

However, if detailed information as to the amount <strong>of</strong> deficiencies is available, the<br />

court must still exercise its discretion and come to conclusions after careful<br />

considerations <strong>of</strong> necessary factors.<br />

In Australia, the statute clearly stated that the amount <strong>of</strong> compensation a court can<br />

award the company is equal to the loss or damage suffered. 166 <strong>The</strong> loss or damage<br />

suffered by creditors in this context, however, must be as a consequence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

insolvent trading. In section 1317H, a civil penalty provision, the statute provides<br />

guidelines to court when awarding damages. It is important to note that, unlike other<br />

provisions in the Corporations Act, section 1317H specifies that damage must be a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> the contravention, i.e. engaging in insolvent trading. 167 <strong>The</strong> court has to<br />

take into consideration the amount <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its made by the person who contravenes<br />

the insolvent trading provision when ascertaining the amount <strong>of</strong> damages suffered by<br />

the corporation. This requirement is absent in section 588J which also provides for<br />

163 See also Re Gellert Developments Ltd (in liq); McCullagh & Anor v Gellert & Anor (2002) 9<br />

NZCLC 262,942.<br />

164 (1990) 5 NZCLC 66,592.<br />

165 (1986) 2 BCR 217.<br />

166 See sections 588J, 588K, 588M; see also section 1317H <strong>of</strong> the Australian Corporations Act 2001.<br />

167 Section 1317H(1)(b) <strong>of</strong> the Australian Corporations Act 2001.<br />

347

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!