14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> decisions <strong>of</strong> the Federal Court illustrated some matters to be considered:<br />

a) <strong>The</strong> court has resorted to the directors‟ position as trustees in order to<br />

allow creditors to attach the property for the purpose <strong>of</strong> execution <strong>of</strong><br />

judgment;<br />

b) Directors did not breach their duty to the creditors when the transfer<br />

<strong>of</strong> land was made because the court in Malaysia had not<br />

acknowledged that directors owe a duty to creditors even when the<br />

company is insolvent. <strong>The</strong> fact that the company is insolvent or on the<br />

verge <strong>of</strong> insolvency was apparent when the company failed to settle<br />

the judgment sum and there was an execution order being made<br />

against it.<br />

Recently, there is an indication by the court that directors have a duty<br />

to consider the interests <strong>of</strong> creditors when the company is insolvent. 70<br />

This tendency can be seen from the decision in Kawin Industrial (in<br />

liquidation) v Tay Tiong Soong 71 where it was held that “a duty is<br />

owed by the directors to the company and to the creditors <strong>of</strong> the<br />

company to ensure that the affairs <strong>of</strong> the company are properly<br />

administered and that its property is not dissipated or exploited for the<br />

benefit <strong>of</strong> directors themselves to the prejudice <strong>of</strong> the creditors.” <strong>The</strong><br />

court then decided that the purported ratification was ineffective<br />

because the company was insolvent.<br />

to the land is indefeasible but the creditor is able to attach the land because the court regarded the<br />

position <strong>of</strong> the directors in this situation as trustees who held the land for the company.<br />

70 In other jurisdictions, however, the duty to creditors when the company is insolvent was established<br />

earlier in 1976 in an Australian case <strong>of</strong> Walker v Wimborne (1976) 3 ACLR 529; see other cases<br />

Kinsela v Russel Kinsela Pty Ltd (1986) 10 ACLR 395; for New Zealand see Nicholson v<br />

Permakraft (N.Z) Ltd [1985] 1 N.Z.L.R 243; see generally Andrew Keay “<strong>The</strong> Director‟s Duty to<br />

take into Account the Interests <strong>of</strong> Company Creditors: When is it Triggered?” (2001) 25 MULR<br />

315[“Duty‟].<br />

71 [2009] 1 MLJ 723 at 734.<br />

203

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!