14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ights against the company are frozen. 19 This is to give an opportunity to an<br />

administrator to concentrate on the management <strong>of</strong> the company without having to<br />

fend <strong>of</strong>f actions from creditors. 20 Hence, it is seen as a temporary measure while the<br />

company is searching for a long term solution.<br />

In Australia, the administration process is stated in Part 5.3A <strong>of</strong> the Corporations Act<br />

2001. <strong>The</strong> Act particularly stated that the intention <strong>of</strong> the administration process is to<br />

execute a deed <strong>of</strong> company arrangement (DCA). <strong>The</strong> objectives <strong>of</strong> this mechanism<br />

are contained in section 435A <strong>of</strong> the Act which has only two objectives, similar to<br />

the UK. 21 However, the third aim <strong>of</strong> administration in the Insolvency Act 1986,<br />

namely to realize property in order to distribute it to one or more <strong>of</strong> the secured or<br />

preferential creditors, is absent in the Australian legislation.<br />

An administrator‘s function is to investigate the company‘s affairs, business,<br />

property and financial circumstances as soon as practical, and to recommend whether<br />

the company should execute a DCA, be wound up or to end the administration, 22 and<br />

these functions do not differ from those in the UK. New Zealand amended its<br />

Companies legislation in 2006, and as a result, a new Part 15A was inserted. <strong>The</strong><br />

new voluntary administration in force in the New Zealand legislation is modeled<br />

after the Australian Corporations Act. Malaysia does not have similar provisions in<br />

its Companies Act and the external management mechanisms remain in receivership<br />

and liquidation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Malaysian Corporate Law Reform Committee (CLRC), in 2007, published a<br />

consultative document which, amongst other things, recommended the adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

19 Ibid, at [1-22].<br />

20 Ibid.<br />

21 For New Zealand see section 239A <strong>of</strong> the Companies' Amendments Act 2006.<br />

22 Robert P. Austin and Ian M. Ramsay Ford’s Principles <strong>of</strong> Corporations law (14 th ed., Lexis Nexis<br />

Butterworth, NSW, 2010) at [27-030], section 438B(2) <strong>of</strong> the Australian Corporations Act 2001;<br />

section 239AE <strong>of</strong> the New Zealand Companies Amendments Act 2006.<br />

313

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!