14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.3.1 Rules Concerning Capital Maintenance<br />

<strong>The</strong> capital maintenance doctrine relates to the rule which restricts the company from<br />

returning to members, monies which have been received for payment <strong>of</strong> shares. 30 A<br />

company may not reduce its share capital since it affects shareholders‟ liabilities to<br />

contribute in liquidation, consequently affecting creditors‟ likelihood to be paid. 31<br />

This doctrine raises questions on the freedom <strong>of</strong> the company to deal with its assets<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> distribution to its members as well as the right to reduce the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

share capital below the initial amount relied on by creditors. 32 <strong>The</strong> prohibition may<br />

prevent the company from undertaking any beneficial form <strong>of</strong> reorganisation which<br />

may benefit shareholders without affecting the interest <strong>of</strong> creditors. 33 To overcome<br />

this, the company is authorised to reduce its capital subject to conditions laid down<br />

in the statute.<br />

<strong>The</strong> law generally requires shareholders‟ approval through special resolution. 34 <strong>The</strong><br />

amendment in the UK in 2006 removed the requirement <strong>of</strong> court‟s confirmation in<br />

relation to private limited company, and replaced it with the directors‟ solvency<br />

declaration. 35 Section 256B <strong>of</strong> the Australian Corporations Act 2001 specifically<br />

provided the reduction should be authorised only if it does not materially prejudice<br />

30 Farrar and Hannigan above n2 at 172.<br />

31 Robert P Austin and Ian M Ramsay Ford’s Principles <strong>of</strong> Corporations Law (14 th ed., Lexis Nexis<br />

Butterworth, NSW, 2010) at [24-530].<br />

32 Paul L. Davies Gower and Davies‟ Principles <strong>of</strong> Modern Company Law (8 th ed., Sweet & Maxwell,<br />

London, 2008) at [13-1].<br />

33 Austin and Ramsay above n31 at [24-530].<br />

34 Section 256B(1) <strong>of</strong> the Australian Corporations Act 2001- shareholders‟ approval subject to<br />

procedures laid down in Part 2J.1 Div 1; section 64(1) <strong>of</strong> the Malaysian Act 1965; section 641(1)(b)<br />

<strong>of</strong> the UK Companies Act 2006.<br />

35 See section 641(1)(a) <strong>of</strong> the UK Companies Act 2006 and see also sections 642-645 <strong>of</strong> the same<br />

Act.<br />

156

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!