14.01.2013 Views

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

View/Open - Research Commons - The University of Waikato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and experiences in order to discharge that duty. <strong>The</strong> objective standard imposed by<br />

the law on directors when exercising their skills, care and experience is provided as<br />

protection to stakeholders from actions which are deemed as unreasonable.<br />

In this instance, the court's role as guardian <strong>of</strong> interests for all parties is important to<br />

determine whether the act is reasonable. However, stakeholders who feel that the<br />

action is not in the interests <strong>of</strong> the company, for example where directors have<br />

breached their fiduciary duty, do not have direct access to the remedy. <strong>The</strong> remedy is<br />

exclusively for the company and shareholders in a derivative action. Further,<br />

shareholders can ratify the action at the general meeting.<br />

Company law is not seen as part <strong>of</strong> mechanism to protect stakeholders because their<br />

interests have been dealt with by specific statutes, for example, consumer protection<br />

law environmental legislation and labour law. Creditors have always been regarded<br />

as superior to the debtors and hence have the ability to protect their own interests.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y are expected to arrange for security and the law should not intervene to<br />

regulate their interests for them. This argument, however, only works in perfect<br />

markets where parties are assumed to have equal bargaining power. In reality, there<br />

are many creditors, especially small creditors, could not demand security and will be<br />

most affected if the company is having difficulty.<br />

<strong>The</strong> duty not to trade when the company is insolvent confers protection to creditors<br />

in addition to insolvency law. In New Zealand, Australia and Malaysia, the law gives<br />

rights to creditors to bring action against directors for breach <strong>of</strong> duty for trading<br />

whilst the company is insolvent. In the UK the right to bring action remains with the<br />

liquidator because the right to bring action for wrongful trading is only available<br />

during liquidation. (<strong>The</strong> issues will be discussed further in Chapter 7). <strong>The</strong><br />

insolvency law also granted employees a position as preferential creditors in respect<br />

<strong>of</strong> certain amounts <strong>of</strong> unpaid wages.<br />

149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!