15.01.2013 Views

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

companies were recommended for financial sanctions. And it named 85 corporations<br />

based in Europe, the United States, Canada, Africa, Asia, <strong>and</strong><br />

Caribbean tax havens that it alleged were in violation of OECD guidelines<br />

for multinational enterprises.<br />

In the latter years of my career I have asked a lot of very sensitive questions<br />

in a lot of very squirrelly places. I give high fives <strong>to</strong> the people who did<br />

this work. The sad part is much of the issue remains unchanged. Some corporations<br />

<strong>and</strong> individuals loudly protested their innocence, the western<br />

world moved on <strong>to</strong> other concerns, <strong>and</strong> the Congolese continue <strong>to</strong>day <strong>to</strong> be<br />

drained, ripped off, threatened, brutalized, <strong>and</strong> killed.<br />

China<br />

<strong>Dirty</strong> <strong>Money</strong> at Work 143<br />

True or false? With its booming economy, soaring per capita income, huge<br />

inflows of foreign investment, <strong>and</strong> large hard-currency surpluses, China<br />

need not worry about dirty money.<br />

False. Pervasive domestic corruption <strong>and</strong> massive outflows of illegal proceeds<br />

threaten China’s hope for peaceful transition <strong>to</strong> a sound market economy.<br />

Instability is the one thing that China cannot risk. Every other nation<br />

that illegally ships immense amounts of its wealth offshore is eventually<br />

destabilized. There’s no reason <strong>to</strong> believe that China is an exception.<br />

Minxin Pei, a China expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International<br />

Peace in Washing<strong>to</strong>n, writes: “Corruption since the mid-1990s has<br />

become in<strong>to</strong>lerable. The blending of a semi-reformed economy, authoritarian<br />

politics, decentralisation <strong>and</strong> burgeoning links <strong>to</strong> the outside world has<br />

allowed corruption <strong>to</strong> mutate in<strong>to</strong> a voracious <strong>and</strong> dangerous strain. ...<br />

Corruption in authoritarian regimes tends <strong>to</strong> amplify systemic risks <strong>and</strong> undermine<br />

the rulers’ legitimacy.” He goes on <strong>to</strong> suggest that China may already<br />

be in “the late stages of regime decay.” 185<br />

The Economist presents an equally sober assessment: “Scholars in China<br />

are beginning <strong>to</strong> suggest what was once heretical: that the country suffers<br />

from ‘systemic corruption.’ . . . [I]t would be hard <strong>to</strong> find any leader whose<br />

associates <strong>and</strong> family members are beyond suspicion.” 186<br />

The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences extended its courtesies <strong>to</strong> me,<br />

arranging appointments <strong>and</strong> providing transla<strong>to</strong>rs on two occasions as I researched<br />

corruption in <strong>and</strong> capital flight out of China. On the second trip,<br />

after one day of interviews the academy-designated transla<strong>to</strong>r was replaced

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!