15.01.2013 Views

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Global Divide 211<br />

arranged in<strong>to</strong> global quintiles <strong>to</strong> offer a picture of all the world’s six-billionplus<br />

inhabitants.<br />

The work of several economists has produced a fascinating picture of<br />

global income disparities beginning in 1820 <strong>and</strong> extending <strong>to</strong> 1980. Figure 5.1<br />

illustrates the stark two-centuries-long rise in inequality. From a gap of 12 <strong>to</strong><br />

1 between <strong>to</strong>p <strong>and</strong> bot<strong>to</strong>m quintiles in 1820, the gap rose <strong>to</strong> 35 <strong>to</strong> 1 by<br />

1980. As one of these writers, Angus Maddison, reported, <strong>to</strong>tal output of<br />

the advanced capitalist countries increased 70-fold, population increased 5fold,<br />

per capita output increased 14-fold, average hours worked dropped by<br />

half, <strong>and</strong> life expectancy doubled. In other words, rich countries soared<br />

while poor countries lagged. 2<br />

In 1994, a United Nations ranking showed that the ratio between the<br />

<strong>to</strong>p <strong>and</strong> bot<strong>to</strong>m income quintiles of the world’s population was 60 <strong>to</strong> 1, a<br />

figure that was repeated often in the press. Unfortunately, the tally was far<br />

from accurate. It was made by ranking countries from richest <strong>to</strong> poorest<br />

based on their average income, then dividing the countries in<strong>to</strong> five roughly<br />

equal population groups, or quintiles. This meant that all citizens of a country<br />

were put in<strong>to</strong> a single global quintile regardless of their actual income,<br />

which may have been much lower or higher than the average. Coming up<br />

with an average income for a whole society is virtually meaningless. Thus, in<br />

FIGURE 5.1 WORLD INEQUALITY 1820–1980<br />

Source: Bourguignon <strong>and</strong> Morrison, 2002.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!