15.01.2013 Views

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

264 CAPITALISM’S <strong>ACHILLES</strong> <strong>HEEL</strong><br />

Now translate the unacceptability of massive disparities in rich<br />

nations on<strong>to</strong> our shrinking sphere. Successful globalization is dependent<br />

on narrowing global divisions. Thomas Friedman, the outst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

New York Times columnist, often asks the question, “What<br />

happens when everyone knows how everyone else lives?” Driven by<br />

satellites, television sets, <strong>and</strong> cell phones, that awakening is rapidly<br />

approaching. As the world grows inescapably closer <strong>and</strong> more interdependent,<br />

what <strong>to</strong>day is in<strong>to</strong>lerable in any one rich country will <strong>to</strong>morrow<br />

be in<strong>to</strong>lerable in a closely linked planet. The existing global<br />

gap <strong>and</strong> the future globalized world are incompatible. Several billion<br />

living in squalor juxtaposed with one billion living in splendor is<br />

simply unsustainable. The 31 <strong>to</strong> 1 disparity has <strong>to</strong> diminish, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

pace of diminution needs <strong>to</strong> exceed the pace of globalization, <strong>and</strong><br />

there is little indication that this is happening at the present time.<br />

2. Richer people have a vested interest in increasing the purchasing<br />

power of poorer people, so that modern goods <strong>and</strong> services devised<br />

in industrialized nations can find broader markets. The best analogy<br />

is Henry Ford in the United States. Ford unders<strong>to</strong>od more than a<br />

hundred years ago that if he was going <strong>to</strong> sell more cars, workers had<br />

<strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong> buy them. He soon doubled the wages he paid <strong>to</strong> $5 a<br />

day, stabilized his work force, <strong>and</strong> maximized their efficiency with assembly<br />

lines. His success <strong>and</strong> influence encouraged rising pay across<br />

the United States, hastened the enlargement of the middle class, <strong>and</strong><br />

thus helped propel western progress, especially in the second half of<br />

the twentieth century.<br />

Another Henry Ford or several Henry Fords are needed <strong>to</strong> propagate<br />

similar goals <strong>and</strong> encourage rising incomes across the globe in<br />

the twenty-first century. This is certainly not the situation that currently<br />

prevails. Instead, western firms chase the lowest wage employees<br />

around the world, <strong>to</strong> Mexico until they get <strong>to</strong>o pricey, then <strong>to</strong><br />

China until they get <strong>to</strong>o pricey, <strong>and</strong> then finally corporations farm<br />

out production processes <strong>to</strong> subcontrac<strong>to</strong>rs who can get away with<br />

low wages <strong>and</strong> poor working conditions, for which western firms<br />

buying the subcontrac<strong>to</strong>rs’ production take little or no responsibility.<br />

Capitalists need <strong>to</strong> figure how <strong>to</strong> be long range in their global thinking.<br />

Instead of paying $2 for that <strong>to</strong>y or garment, how about paying

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!