15.01.2013 Views

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

It’s the 70 <strong>to</strong> 90 Percent that Matters 273<br />

not wasting the money. We’re not throwing it away. We’re making it safe <strong>and</strong><br />

secure <strong>and</strong> earning a decent return. Only wealth accumulation <strong>and</strong> preservation<br />

matter. If the gap doesn’t matter, what worsens the gap doesn’t matter<br />

either. That’s simply not the business of capitalism. Other people have <strong>to</strong><br />

deal with those kinds of issues. Helping global corporations <strong>and</strong> rich people<br />

shift their money by illegal means doesn’t matter. They’ve already made it.<br />

Where they keep it is for them <strong>to</strong> know.<br />

What I’m implying here is that part of the reason the gap does matter<br />

is because so many people think it doesn’t matter <strong>and</strong> then take actions<br />

based on that notion. I’ve s<strong>to</strong>od in front of business <strong>and</strong> banking groups<br />

talking about the movement of illicit proceeds out of developing <strong>and</strong><br />

transitional economies. You’d be surprised how many people think that<br />

there are no economic consequences whatsoever <strong>to</strong> such actions. If the<br />

gap doesn’t matter, then income <strong>and</strong> wealth derived at the expense of the<br />

poor doesn’t matter. There’s only one minor question: Is it legal? Or,<br />

more bluntly, can it be accomplished without getting caught? But consequences<br />

<strong>to</strong> others? That’s not of concern.<br />

It’s not only the business <strong>and</strong> banking communities. Many people in the<br />

aid community believe that poverty can be conquered without addressing<br />

inequality. Again, I disagree. Focusing only on global poverty prejudices the<br />

way we deal with global poverty. With eyes locked on the bot<strong>to</strong>m of Figure<br />

5.2, Global GPD <strong>and</strong> Global Quintile Income Disparity, you miss what’s at<br />

the <strong>to</strong>p—70 <strong>to</strong> 90 percent of global income. And you miss how a lot of that<br />

money got <strong>to</strong> the <strong>to</strong>p. Your concern is not the rich; it’s the poor. You send<br />

aid <strong>to</strong> the poor, but what the rich do is largely off your radar screen. And<br />

what the rich in poor countries do in league with the rich in rich countries is<br />

completely off your radar screen. You’re dependent on rich people in rich<br />

countries giving you money <strong>to</strong> distribute <strong>to</strong> what you hope are poor people<br />

in poor countries. You’re not about <strong>to</strong> bite the h<strong>and</strong> that feeds you. Shenanigans<br />

between the rich over there <strong>and</strong> the rich here are not noticed. You’ve<br />

got your eyes on the poor, on aid going in<strong>to</strong> poor countries. Millions of dollars<br />

in administrative costs are spent in order <strong>to</strong> send billions of dollars of<br />

loans <strong>and</strong> grants <strong>to</strong> the poor. You don’t notice the hundreds of billions of<br />

dollars that come the other way, out of those poor countries. Those flows<br />

worsen inequality in poor countries, but you’re not in<strong>to</strong> inequality, you’re<br />

in<strong>to</strong> poverty.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!