15.01.2013 Views

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

202 CAPITALISM’S <strong>ACHILLES</strong> <strong>HEEL</strong><br />

We have been guided for many years by an implicit cost–benefit analysis<br />

suggesting that the receipt of such money is good for the United States,<br />

good for Europe. It shows the strength of our economies. People in foreign<br />

countries want <strong>to</strong> bring their money in<strong>to</strong> our systems where they know it<br />

will be safe <strong>and</strong> can grow. Succeeding administrations in the United States<br />

<strong>and</strong> Europe have encouraged this view.<br />

Supporters of dirty money have never subjected this issue <strong>to</strong> a real<br />

cost–benefit analysis. I outline some of what must be included in such an<br />

appraisal <strong>and</strong> then at the end of this chapter lay down a challenge <strong>to</strong> others<br />

who should delve in<strong>to</strong> these same questions.<br />

The Benefits<br />

<strong>Dirty</strong> money brings hundreds of billions of dollars out of nonwestern countries<br />

in<strong>to</strong> western countries. My figure is a half-trillion dollars a year, accumulating<br />

<strong>to</strong> trillions lodged permanently in deposits, properties, <strong>and</strong> market<br />

investments in Europe <strong>and</strong> the United States. The other half-trillion out of<br />

the trillion-dollar annual flow circulates between western countries themselves<br />

<strong>and</strong> cooperating tax havens. Some may feel that this is a benefit <strong>to</strong> the<br />

West, contributing <strong>to</strong> maximizing private profit <strong>and</strong> reducing the role of<br />

government. This is a dubious argument at best, <strong>and</strong> I record it only <strong>to</strong><br />

round out the case that others make for dirty money.<br />

The Costs<br />

If a half-trillion is supposedly a net gain <strong>to</strong> the West <strong>and</strong> another half-trillion<br />

may serve <strong>to</strong> discipline overreaching western governments, what is the<br />

downside attached <strong>to</strong> these flows? The costs can be seen in the impact on<br />

both domestic <strong>and</strong> foreign interests of western countries. Domestically it<br />

shields <strong>and</strong> thereby facilitates drug, criminal, <strong>and</strong> terrorist money passing<br />

in<strong>to</strong> the West. This voids anti–money laundering as an effective instrument<br />

in the fight against such perils, thereby weakening the ability of western<br />

states <strong>to</strong> counter some of their most serious threats. And internationally it<br />

undermines key foreign policy objectives of the United States <strong>and</strong> Europe in<br />

poorer countries in Asia, Latin America, <strong>and</strong> Africa <strong>and</strong> in the former Soviet<br />

Union <strong>and</strong> Eastern Europe. Together the damage done <strong>to</strong> the fabric of western<br />

societies resulting from an appetite for dirty money is staggering.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!